User talk:428CobraJetKiller

December 2012[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kim Jung-Woo. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Webclient101^talk 03:07, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kim Woo-jung, you may be blocked from editing. Webclient101^talk 03:07, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kim Jung-Woo, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Webclient101^talk 03:12, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Qwyrxian (talk) 03:12, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user (block log | active blocks | autoblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs | abuse log) has had their talk page access revoked because an administrator has identified this user's talkpage edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. If you would like to make further requests, you may contact the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-appeals-en@lists.wikimedia.org. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 17:57, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]