User talk:46.149.249.106

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Who do you think I am?[edit]

@Iggy the Swan and NinjaRobotPirate: - guess who has created two accounts from this IP address? Clue: read this page.

Thanks to NinjaRobotPirate, I am forced to reveal my IP address to you all. If you look at all contributions made from this IP address, now what do you think of this registered user? Am I this guy? No. There's your last clue. Pinging @Johannnes89: for their information as to why they don't believe different people operate different accounts. 46.149.249.106 (talk) 15:45, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Request unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

46.149.249.106 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have seen the reason for blocking my latest account. I have denied this in the past and am doing so again. I am not Mike Matthews17 and I now know the IP address range that person's using which is 84.9.228.0/22. Bob, Mr. Bentley and Farmer Pickles, you must believe me. 46.149.249.106 (talk) 15:08, 10 October 2022 (UTC) (who used to edit as User:Spud the Scarecrow, User:Spud the Wikipedian and User:Spud the Cleaner).[reply]

Decline reason:

You admit you are Spud the Wikipedian, a blocked user. Until your account is unblocked, you (you personally) are not permitted to edit here. We certainly won't consider lifting the block on this IP address range, as it is correctly stopping you from editing. Yamla (talk) 17:13, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

That's very true (except Spud the Scarecrow was my first ever account and I admitted to that for my unblock request).
Ideally I would like to know why Mr. Bentley thought I was Mike Matthews17 but the user has not responded on here once (or Bob) so I will have to wait for six months to help Wikipedia again. 46.149.249.106 (talk) 10:17, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not ping me again and please do not call my Mr. Bentley (or any other character name from Bob the Builder), my name is Johannnes89 (or Johannes). The first (and only) edit of Spud the Scarecrow was this [1] which is „surprisingly“ similar to what Stephen Carlsen64, another Mike Matthews17 sockpuppet wrote [2][3]. I cannot imagine a reasonable explanation why a newly registered user would write something like that other than trolling / being another sockpuppet of Mike Matthews17. --Johannnes89 (talk) 10:48, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
1. I didn't realise I was pinging users if you were pinged.
2. I was trying to make "Iggy the Swan" aware that they had a bogus Covid notice on their talk page but the user did not make that contribution. Their talk page was disabled for editing so I edited the talk page of "Robby.is.on" to check if they know what was wrong. Eventually ToBeFree did and thanked that user for removing that.
3. [3] no longer exists apparently.
4. I am getting the impression that "Robby.is.on" thinks I am Mike Matthews, they are incorrect. "Find something useful to do with your life", I scan papers on most Mondays, Tuesdays and Thursdays, doing other things for the remainder of the weeks including scaring crows.
5. "Iggy the Swan" I assumed is Bob a week ago with that question hence that is who they must have been. 46.149.249.106 (talk) 11:18, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Point 4: I have a feeling you just saw my user talk page and put those days into your latest response. Conclusion: pinging users like me and Johannnes89 then hiding our proper user names with those from the show Bob the Builder and picking out information on my talk page and using it as your own info is not good. We're more than 50% sure you're Mike Matthews17 through at least two IP address ranges. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 15:50, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Iggy the Swan: the IP beginning with 46 comes from Salford. The 84.9.228.0/22 range comes from Birmingham which is a different place. Therefore at least two people using the IP's are editing Wikipedia, one is me who is good and the other/s are the baddies. Please check Geolocate. In addition, we are all on the LTA's bad list[4]. 46.149.249.106 (talk) 15:12, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

46.149.249.106 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not Mike Matthews. If you check the geolocate between my Ip address and the 84.9.228.0/22 range, you can see I am from Salford and the range is from Birmingham. "Spud the Scarecrow" should never have been globally locked in the first place. 46.149.249.106 (talk) 15:16, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline. This is not the place to contest your block. Yamla (talk) 15:34, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:46.149.249.106&oldid=1115858567"