User talk:46.208.152.88

Welcome![edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, such as the ones you made to Kazakhs. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create a named account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

Create new pages and rename pages
Edit semi-protected pages
Upload images
Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

Note that in order for the first three features to be available, you must have had an account for a certain number of days and made a certain number of edits.

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (46.208.152.88) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Happy editing! JesseRafe (talk) 14:01, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion[edit]

You were bold, but your edit was reverted multiple times, now it's time to gain consensus for your changes at the article talk page. But, honestly, this is so much part of the mainstream convention when it comes to US topics on Wikipedia, I tend to doubt your chances. El_C 23:14, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's pretty bloody obvious that undefined acronyms are not helpful, except in a tiny number of cases (listed here) where they genuinely are likely to be understood by everyone. 46.208.152.88 (talk) 23:17, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Well, personally, I disagree. But that is certainly something you ought to bring up on the article talk page. El_C 23:26, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you're wrong. The consensus is that a handful of examples don't need defining, and everything else does. 46.208.152.88 (talk) 23:29, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

46.208.152.88 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have not done anything meriting a block. The accusation of "long term abuse" is clearly absurd - a glance at my contributions will show that they do not remotely resemble any kind of abuse.

Decline reason:

Confirmed LTA.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 11:54, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.