User talk:46.217.188.29

January 2022

Hello, I'm C.Fred. I noticed that you recently removed content from Danela Arsovska without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —C.Fred (talk) 00:52, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Danela Arsovska, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. If the content is "wrong", please provide counter-sources to demonstrate that. —C.Fred (talk) 00:55, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Danela Arsovska, you may be blocked from editing. —C.Fred (talk) 01:07, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, 46.217.188.29. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Danela Arsovska, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. You have declared that you are editing at the direction of Arsovska. If you have been paid by her, you must declare that also. —C.Fred (talk) 01:06, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2022

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Danela Arsovska) for a period of 24 hours for edit warring.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  —C.Fred (talk) 01:08, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

• No editor—and especially not a paid editor—may blank content from an article just because they find it unflattering. The material appears to be cited to secondary sources; you'll have to raise a challenge to the sources at the talk page rather than just blanking the section. —C.Fred (talk) 01:21, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

---