User talk:50.91.104.233

April 2020[edit]

Hello, I'm Driverofknowledge. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Driverofknowledge (talk) 22:17, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021[edit]

Hello, I'm Paper9oll. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Rushmore University have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. — 🍊 Paper9oll 🍊 (📣 • 📝) 14:09, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not remove information from articles, as you did to Rushmore University. Wikipedia is not censored, and content is not removed on the sole grounds of perceived offensiveness. Please discuss this issue on the article's talk page to reach consensus rather than continuing to remove the disputed material. If the content in question involves images, you also have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide the images that you may find offensive. Thank you. — 🍊 Paper9oll 🍊 (📣 • 📝) 14:36, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Rushmore University; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Knuthove (talk) 22:49, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for promotion or advertising, as you did at Rushmore University. Shinyedit^bonjour. 22:57, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Knuthove (talk) 23:27, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Rushmore University. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Rushmore University; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Chiming in flagging this user for vandalism and edit wars.

Warning level will escalate level for each unwarranted reversion. 87.49.147.11 (talk) 00:13, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please take a look at the last edits and see if they work for you. You keep adding back the comment about Diploma Mill which is untrue and slanderous. Please also take a look at the comments at the following link https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:87.49.147.11

Let's work together to make this page accurate and positive. Any suggestions on how to make this work without the Diploma Mill comment and promoting some positive about Rushmore University?

That is just the same wording as before. Please keep this discussion on the article talk page. As it says on the third option page you applied for help from: "Before making a request here, be sure that the issue has been thoroughly discussed on the article talk page." You have not done this.

I believe you might have a case with the diploma mill statement, because that source might not be reliable per Wikipedia's guidelines (WP:RELIABLE). Your editing here has only served to convince me that it is in fact a diploma mill, but Wikipedia does not care about what I think, only about what I can find sources for. In any case, you should stop reverting edits immediately, discuss on the talk page and respect the consensus that emerges from that discussion. Knuthove (talk) 00:34, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing.

Yes, I agree. This person smells more and more like a diploma mill, the more involvement there is by this user to hype it. As a matter of principle, we should revert until editors agree what it should say.

87.49.147.11 (talk) 01:40, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at PageName.

The troll user 50.91.104.233 now likely also operates as 75.113.162.64. (See the talk pages of vandalized pages for details.)

February 2021[edit]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 11:01, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.