User talk:51.7.23.61

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

51.7.23.61 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I wasn't doing anything wrong!

Decline reason:

Evading blocks is wrong. Huon (talk) 18:22, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I mean, "Workers accidentally were exposed" is obviously not grammatical, right? So I fixed it. And someone's unfixed it!! Deliberately restoring errors to articles is very disruptive behaviour, isn't it? 51.7.23.61 (talk) 17:02, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

February 2020

Hello, I'm DoebLoggs. I noticed that you recently removed content from Sudden infant death syndrome without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. DoebLoggs (talk) 11:17, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

---