Jump to content

User talk:56.0.163.15

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

While it is valid to identify the controversy around Greenwood's service, this section contains too much POV.

Please do not add unhelpful and non-constructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to Fluffing. Your edits could be considered vandalism, and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Fram 16:06, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Adrian Paul

[edit]

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Adrian Paul worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Rosenknospe 10:33, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

May 2008

[edit]

Hi, the recent edit you made to Charitable organization has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. treelo talk 13:11, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

August 2008

[edit]

Hi, the recent edit you made to Adriana Sage has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. LGF1992UK (talk) 13:04, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Rhaphidophoridae has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. cf38talk 17:10, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Hajj, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 19:08, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2020

[edit]

Hello, I'm Melmann. I noticed that in this edit to The Hundred Thousand Kingdoms, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Melmann 18:32, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The_Inheritance_Trilogy

[edit]

Thanks for identifying the source of the material in your edit.

This type of edit does get picked up by Copy Patrol and a good edit summary helps to make sure we don't accidentally revert it. However, for future use, would you note the best practices wording as outlined at Wikipedia:Copying_within_Wikipedia? In particular, adding the phrase "see that page's history for attribution" helps ensure that proper attribution is preserved.S Philbrick(Talk) 13:27, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]