Jump to content

User talk:61.88.183.109

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


November 2013

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Hurstville, New South Wales has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

December 2013

[edit]

Information icon Please do not add defamatory content to Wikipedia, as you did to Stone Cold Steve Austin, especially if it involves living persons. Thank you. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹Speak 23:30, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2014

[edit]

February is a wonderful month

April 2014

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

61.88.183.109 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Not sure why I'm blocked and there is no notification of the block on my talk page. The reason provided by John in the block log is 'block evasion', but I'm not certain which block I'm supposed to be evading? If John is under the impression I am another blocked user, I'd like to request an Administrator review the IP addresses history of said user, to confirm I am not he/she.

Decline reason:

First, you can't say you're not sure why you're blocked when, as you go on to admit, the stated reason is "block evasion". Second, if you're not certain which block you're supposed to be evading, that sort of implies to me that you are, indeed, a multiply blocked user and therefore this request is just continued game-playing (is it, Mack?). Third, you are in effect asking for a checkuser to "prove" your innocence—which we rarely do since it's next to impossible to prove (and usually the mere request is seen as a sign of a sockmaster who thought they covered their tracks more effectively than they did). Lastly, apart from the block-evasion allegation (made by more than one editor, BTW), you just come across as tendentious and prone to combativeness, which is not what we want in our editors. — Daniel Case (talk) 19:14, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

November 2015

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Tito Vilanova because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 05:03, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2023

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Bojo1498. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Brazilian jiu-jitsu, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. (bojo)(they/them)(talk) 02:57, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2024

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Joyous!. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Jase & Lauren, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Joyous! Noise! 04:19, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.