User talk:66.47.62.78

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

AfD nomination of Refugee ships[edit]

An editor has nominated Refugee ships, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Refugee ships and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 02:44, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Scottish Reformed Church in Elbląg[edit]

The article Scottish Reformed Church in Elbląg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable institution. Unsourced since creation over 11 years ago. All online refs I could find are either non-notable or are copies of or trace back to this article. If a source could be found, a mention of this institution might be mentioned in the Scots section of the Ethnic minorities in Poland article, but a separate article isn't justified

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TransporterMan (TALK) 16:18, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Zbigniew Brzezinski has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non sequitur. Likely vandalism.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rhadow (talk) 17:04, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]