User talk:68.36.175.168

Uncited, non-constructive edits[edit]

There has never been anything to discuss with you other than your own vindictive edits.

I welcome a review by your Admin and your vindictive edits, as if you had researched these edits as closely as you claim to in these User Talk tirades, you would see that many of your claims are false and that you are severing and changing long standing approved edits, additions, and information.

I never wrote : "The film is expected to be an Indian Blockbuster from the hype, Hollywood REMIX, and with no major release for the next two weeks after it's release"...Someone else did. - Did you go butcher everything they added to Wikipedia too ?

You keep kicking "Skull & Chopsticks" info of the "Mic Neumann" page when it was Wikipedia that merged the two entries.

I supply all of the links to all of the people I have worked with who list me, Michael "Mic" Neumann aka Mic Neumann as working with them in Wikipedia, yet you don't just delete them, you wholesale delete everything.

I don't know what your problem is with me, and I am sorry if I do not understand all of the exact rules that you state need to be followed in making entries as all I know is that I am trying to use Wikipedia for what I thought it was intended for, which is a source of truthful information supplied by the source.

You seem to have some other slash and burn approach to people or things that you don't seem to like, as I could find hundreds of less qualified or non-cited entries, yet you seem to have singled me out as a special focus of your single handed destruction.

Your current Admin investigation should reveal that past Admin evaluations have found my entries suitable after your protests, yet you continue to attack my entries at every opportunity.

I feel sorry for people who get such great pleasure out of such petty grievances as I know everything I have entered is true, and everyone knows you can not every circumstance involved in your life documented by a third party.

Why don't you lighten up and above all get your facts straight and think hard about your use of the word "Evidently POV", because that is exactly what you are doing with the majority of your claims, and it is this that is exactly the reason I have found having a discussion with you a waste of time.

I am entering facts about my life and my projects and you delete them.

A perfect example of your overzealousness as I have mentioned above is your repeated wholesale removal of the "Skull & Chopsticks" entry from my "Mic Neumann" page, when it was Wikipedia that merged them together in the first place, and who is going to know what the meaning of the "Skull & Chopsticks" logo means without me stating it, since only I know what it stands for ?

No, in your world...I have to tell someone else about it first, then they have to publish it, then I can enter it with citations ? - Well then why did Wikipedia let me enter in the first place so long ago.

If this it what people like you are contributing to Wikipedia ... I am really at a loss for words.

I guess I should be happy that I gave a someone like you an evil dragon like me to slay.

Sincerely, Michael "Mic" Neumann - & - if you want to discuss something call me at [redacted]

As I wrote before, and as is available via your page history, you have been making a series of unconstructive edits that violate multiple Wikipedia policies. At Kites (film) and Dubtitle, you have variously

removed citation-request tags without providing citations
made multiple uncited, non-footnoted claims, some of them evidently POV and OR
left no edit summaries
refused discussion
added such hype as "The film is expected to be an Indian Blockbuster from the hype, Hollywood REMIX, and with no major release for the next two weeks after it's release"
and engaged in apparent sock-puppetry via anon IP 209.236.250.213. An admin has checked and has seen that one of these two IPs appears to be a mobile phone IP, and the other a home IP.

I have asked several times over the last few days that you discontinue your disruptive edits. After several warnings, I have begun dialog with an admin who may choose to block your IPs from editing Wikipedia. You do not appear interested in constructive edits, behavior or dialog. This is not in the best interest of this encyclopedia. --Tenebrae (talk) 02:22, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]