User talk:69lolz4

June 2008[edit]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Chzz ► 11:24, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for 31 hours from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy because your account is being used solely to create nonsense pages. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. -- Netsnipe ► 11:31, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|I've been blocked "for 31 hours" for over a week now!}}

You should have been automatically unblocked. Have you tried editing a page? If you are still blocked, you could be affected by another block. If so, paste the block message you get below, and we'll try to sort it out for you. — :-)

Stwalkerster [ talk ] 09:08, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

The block log indicates that you are not currently blocked. Per Stwalkerster, please post any block messages you receive if and when you attempt to edit. We'll sort it out for you.

Request handled by: UltraExactZZ ^Claims~ Evidence 15:00, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

George Sampson[edit]

You need to provide a reliable source for any edits you make; accordingly, I've reverted your recent edit until you provide one. Thanks. --Rodhull andemu 11:34, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of George Sampson Haters[edit]

Please do not make personal attacks. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. uɐɔlnʌɟoʞǝɹɐs 11:52, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:George Samson haters logo.JPG[edit]

Please do not make personal attacks. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:George Samson haters logo.JPG|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. uɐɔlnʌɟoʞǝɹɐs 11:57, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

69lolz4 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

what do you mean by abuse?

Decline reason:

WP:SOCK breaching the sockpuppet policy. Namely using multiple accounts in a reprehensible way. — -- lucasbfr ^talk 14:50, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.