User talk:70.29.212.131

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Articles for Creation[edit]

Your nomination at Articles for Creation was a success, and Advance Game Port was created.

Thank you for helping Wikipedia! -FASTILY (TALK) 18:23, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Mont-Tremblant Grand Prix you submitted has been created.

  • The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see what needs to be done to bring it to the next level.
  • Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia, and please consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.
  • If you would to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping Wikipedia! -- /DeltaQuad|Notify Me\ 14:50, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cosmological void you submitted has been created.

Thank you for helping Wikipedia! -FASTILY (TALK) 18:04, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cosmic Void you submitted has been created.

Thank you for helping Wikipedia! -FASTILY (TALK) 18:04, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Void galaxy you submitted has been created.

  • The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see what needs to be done to bring it to the next level.
  • Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia, and please consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.
  • If you would to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping Wikipedia! Blurpeace 18:42, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, as you were user who participated in the previous discussion concerning Hot companion as an article for deletion, I thought it appropriate to inform you that it is being considered again. If you have any input for the current discussion, it will help in establishing a consensus (or lack thereof)Nstock (talk) 19:55, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]