User talk:70.52.212.244

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

Your host, HULLPQ20-1177867508.sdsl.bell.ca (70.52.212.244), is registered to Bell Canada, an Internet service provider through which multiple users may connect to the Internet via proxy, so you may receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free.

Review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, administrators should consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.

Network administrators, to monitor this IP address for vandalism, can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Welcome!

Hello, 70.52.212.244, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Laurinavicius (talk) 22:55, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Your test on the page United States Patent and Trademark Office worked, and has been removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing and its related help page for more information. Thank you. Tresiden (talk) 17:24, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Talk:United States Patent and Trademark Office. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Tresiden (talk) 17:30, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Free electron laser has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_VyTCyizqrHs/S6O03agv1iI/AAAAAAAAHBw/KmoI1cmILLs/s1600-h/FEL100kw.jpg (matching the regex rule \bblog(?:cu|fa|harbor|mybrain|post|savy|spot|townhall)?\.com\b). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. an image file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 19:19, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Hello

Hello. Thanks for your edits. May I suggest, however, that you get a Wikipedia account? Some times people lose their IP address, and you can edit more articles if you have an account. At any rate, keep up the good work!--Dark Charles (talk) 21:27, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism of the Federal Reserve

Please note that we do not permit original research, synthesis, or editorial opinion. A dictionary definition is not a criticism of the Federal Reserve. To source usury as a criticism of the Federal Reserve, you must cite a third-party reliable source that reports about some individual or group expressing such a criticism. Yworo (talk) 22:16, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page World Bank has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Gary King (talk · scripts) 22:16, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page The Pentagon. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Grafen (talk) 22:21, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to National Security Agency. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Gary King (talk · scripts) 22:22, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Minaret controversy in Switzerland, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you! -- Zachlipton (talk) 06:43, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Chicxulub crater, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Fama Clamosa (talk) 17:36, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Identity document, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. RashersTierney (talk) 20:04, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Identity document with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. NickCT (talk) 02:46, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Central Intelligence Agency with this edit. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. — Mr. Stradivarius ^♫ 17:34, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just to clarify - if you want to include a claim like the one you added, you should add it to the article itself, and most importantly, it should be backed up by a reliable source. If you have any questions about what a reliable source would be in this case, please reply here and I will be happy to help you. All the best. — Mr. Stradivarius ^♫ 17:39, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Zarcadia (talk) 17:35, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to JPMorgan Chase. Meph^talk 17:41, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Mariscal Estigarribia do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia.
Your edit here to Mariscal Estigarribia was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EnSauj2855M) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 20:15, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Wikipedia policies

Just to be clear: please read WP:V, WP:N, WP:OR, WP:RS, WP:SYNTHESIS, WP:FRINGE and WP:WEIGHT. Contributions which violate these policies are not allowed. Beyond My Ken (talk) 20:26, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not replace pages with blank content, as you did with this edit to User talk:Beyond My Ken, as this is confusing to readers. The page's content has been restored for now. If there is a problem with the page, it should be edited or reverted to a previous version if possible; if you think the page should be removed entirely, see further information. Thank you. – GorillaWarfare ^{talk • contribs} 02:24, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011

Thank you for your contribution to Mike Smith (actor), but we are trying to write an encyclopedia here, so please keep your edits factual and neutral. Our readers are looking for serious articles and will not find joke edits amusing. Remember that Wikipedia is a widely used reference tool, so we have to take what we do here seriously. If you'd like to experiment with editing, use the sandbox to get started. Thank you. Gert7 (talk · contribs) 11:33, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Nickel, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 03:45, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:submit}} to the top of the article.)

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Charity Shoal Crater.
To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the reviewer's talk page. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 01:38, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. Please remember to observe this. Thank you. Ifnord (talk) 02:49, 18 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2012

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Red mist. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Skol fir (talk) 21:27, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Red mist, you may be blocked from editing. --Skol fir (talk) 21:46, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to User talk:Skol fir. Jim1138 (talk) 03:09, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 03:14, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

70.52.212.244 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The person doing the block is a toss off

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. - Barek (talk • contribs) - 03:20, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

April 2012

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Vic Toews. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. --Skol fir (talk) 01:48, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Vic Toews. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Skol fir (talk) 16:05, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Vic Toews, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Karl 334 ^Talk-^-Contribs 21:09, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The edit in question was actually not vandalism in this case, but simply a matter of extraneous additions to the lede section. --Skol fir (talk) 00:22, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2013

Hello, I'm Makecat. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Ishmael, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Make cat 03:14, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Original research issues in Minoan civilization /1/

February 2013

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Minoan civilization, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Geremy Hebert (talk | contribs) 21:10, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2013

Hello, I'm Ducknish. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Rockstar (drink), because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Ducknish (talk) 00:06, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Charity Shoal Crater concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Charity Shoal Crater, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 15:02, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission Charity Shoal Crater

Hello 70.52.212.244. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Charity Shoal Crater.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Charity Shoal Crater}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 15:00, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Charity Shoal Crater was accepted

Charity Shoal Crater, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 17:35, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.