Jump to content

User talk:70.67.126.147

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2024

[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Temporal paradox, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. DVdm (talk) 01:41, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't aware that citing a movie as an example constituted original research. In one of the other temporal paradox definitions in the article, a movie was sited as an example. Do you mean that I have to find someone else citing this movie to not be original research, that noting the movie itself is not enough? 70.67.126.147 (talk) 14:58, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The original research is in your comments and interpretation of the movie. The movie does not mention "information being created from nothing". Phrases such as "This means that" and "therefore constitudes" are typical OR. Other examples of such comments in the article don't warrant adding some more. If you see such long-standing examples in an article, perhaps there is a good reason for their survival, but feel free to go to the article talk page and report them.
And yes, indeed, if some relevant wp:reliable source says that this movie indeed provides an example of the paradox of information being created from nothing, then that could be used as a source, and there would be no OR from your part. Cheers. - DVdm (talk) 15:39, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

Create an account

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! — ♠Ixtal ( T / C ) Non nobis solum. 07:53, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

BTW if you ever decide to create an account, feel free to drop by my user talk page to let me know :). — ♠Ixtal ( T / C ) Non nobis solum. 07:55, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]