User talk:72.135.248.71

August 2023[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Megamind have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Megamind was changed by 72.135.248.71 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.870954 on 2023-08-26T10:20:24+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:20, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Megamind. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Barry Wom (talk) 10:23, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop attacking other contributors, as you did with this edit to Talk:Megamind. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Adakiko (talk) 10:35, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make a personal attack, as you did with this edit to Talk:Megamind. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. --WikiUser1234945-- (talk) 10:54, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I did not have any intention on vandalizing anything barry literally went back and changed things that where up for months and his only excuse was for changing it was they "follow guidelines." If they didn't follow guidelines they would have been taken off fairly quickly. I know from experience that whenever something is edited wrongly it gets changed back fast. He only changed it back to make his argument seem better. 72.135.248.71 (talk) 01:32, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

wrong talk page ignore this please. 72.135.248.71 (talk) 01:32, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring notice[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Megamind. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Adakiko (talk) 10:30, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 11:03, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

replying if you didn't see the message

This is a reply that was made on my page about a film I tried to edit a page for a film on wikipedia in which it literally took me about 2 hours to get everything in order and I had sources set up. Yet they claimed it was "poorly worded." Or not well sourced. Earlier attempts to change the page of the film have tried to use "Know your meme" and "YouTube." However they changed it because they "where not reliable sources." Read the full edit please. (I did this because I'm blocked from editing on Wikipedia by "ToBeFree" Read the lower page please.)

I spent literally 2 hours trying to edit the page for the film at one point and yet they didn't accept. I plead with the people there to to try and help me fix issues that I've made during the edit however they literally did NOTHING about it expect change it back. They claimed Know your meme and YouTube cannot be used for sources. How? I have 2 examples of this firstly is on the article that lists the various characters from the nintendo video game "Punch-out!!" Where they mention super macho man it has a piece of information on there that acknowledges the characters meme status. And guess where it comes from? Know your meme. That reversion was made on November 4th 2022 a full 9 MONTHS of it being on there. (Link of the edit here : https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1119960880) The second example is Youtuber "Coryxkenshin." Where he talks about things that happened in his personal life and there are 2 videos from YouTube on that page. The edit was made a literal month ago on July 21th. (Edit link here : https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1166428627) both of these edits are still on the page which have been on there for MONTHS. So if I can't include know your meme and yotube as sources why can they do so? It has baffled me. 72.135.248.71 (talk) 19:59, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is ridiculous.[edit]

I spent literally 2 hours trying to edit the page for the film at one point and yet they didn't accept. I plead with the people there to to try and help me fix issues that I've made during the edit however they literally did NOTHING about it expect change it back. They claimed Know your meme and YouTube cannot be used for sources. How? I have 2 examples of this firstly is on the article that lists the various characters from the nintendo video game "Punch-out!!" Where they mention super macho man it has a piece of information on there that acknowledges the characters meme status. And guess where it comes from? Know your meme. That reversion was made on November 4th 2022 a full 9 MONTHS of it being on there. (Link of the edit here : https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1119960880) The second example is Youtuber "Coryxkenshin." Where he talks about things that happened in his personal life and there are 2 videos from YouTube on that page. The edit was made a literal month ago on July 21th. (Edit link here : https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1166428627) both of these edits are still on the page which have been on there for MONTHS. So if I can't include know your meme and youtube as sources why can they do so? It has baffled me. 72.135.248.71 (talk) 19:20, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023[edit]

Hello. Your recent edit to Article appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. NotAGenious (talk) 14:41, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Barry Wom (talk) 15:33, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Megamind. --WikiUser1234945-- (talk) 15:35, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

did not have any intention on vandalizing anything barry literally went back and changed things that where up for months and his only excuse was for changing it was they "follow guidelines." If they didn't follow guidelines they would have been taken off fairly quickly. I know from experience that whenever something is edited wrongly it gets changed back fast. He only changed it back to make his argument seem better. 72.135.248.71 (talk) 01:33, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:35, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I quite literally did not intend on doing anything. Barry was going back and changing articles that where on for months at a time and his excuse was "Wrong things can stay on for a long time!" Please barry. Whenever I've edited a article it has "non verifiable information." Or isn't worded well. It gets taken off very quickly by users he only took it off after I pointed out there where examples of other things used in articles that can be used such as YouTube videos or know your meme. He only had me banned due to the fact he was losing his argument. But of course he's a public figure here he got off scott free for taking off stuff that once again il say. Was on for months. Another thing I found while doing research regarding what can and can't be put on here is there are quote "people who lack the ability to cooperate." I was literally trying to do that several times asking for the help of other users to help me properly word out certain things as I'm admittedly not the best at editing pages on here but literally no one helped me out. Not a single person tried. All they did was change it back and not do anything to help me out. It's absolutely absurd. 72.135.248.71 (talk) 09:09, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I also found a link that mentions the video I'm trying to get on there but of course wikipedia bans people for way too long so i have to post it here. I'd try and show barry but I can't. https://chattymatters.com/9761/previous-articles-videos/the-rise-of-the-video-essay/ 72.135.248.71 (talk) 20:10, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hurry and reply please. 72.135.248.71 (talk) 01:48, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I looked at your edits. No. Drmies (talk) 01:50, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Who are you? I Don't even know who you are. 72.135.248.71 (talk) 01:51, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orientem reply please and who even is this drmies guy? He wasn't apart of this discussion 72.135.248.71 (talk) 01:57, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ad Orientem, this is really the gift that keeps on giving. Drmies (talk) 02:00, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Ad Orientem (talk) 02:29, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Block extended and talk page privileges revoked. Ping Drmies. -Ad Orientem (talk) 02:31, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.