User talk:74.42.44.210

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

Your host, static-74-42-44-210.dr01.myck.or.frontiernet.net (74.42.44.210), is registered to Frontier Communications and is believed to be a static address used by only one connection. However, this IP address may represent more than one user, accessing the Internet via several personal computers or devices.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user.

Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock.

If vandalism is noted from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.

Network administrators, to monitor this IP address for vandalism, can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Welcome![edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create a named account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

Create new pages and rename pages
Edit semi-protected pages
Upload images
Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

Note that in order for the first three features to be available, you must have had an account for a certain number of days and made a certain number of edits.

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (74.42.44.210) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 23:39, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Dixie Dregs, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 02:39, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018[edit]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Big Smo, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:51, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Do not use multiple IP addresses to vandalize Wikipedia, like you did at Chuck Berry on Stage. Such attempts to avoid detection or circumvent the blocking policy will not succeed. You are welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia but your recent edits have been reverted or removed. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Block evasion by Special:Contributions/166.182.84.40. Binksternet (talk) 02:17, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

THAT IS A LIE AND YOU KNOW IT. THERE HAS NEVER BEEN ANY BLOCK EVASION FROM THIS IP. 74.42.44.210 (talk) 21:15, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Standing in the Spotlight, you may be blocked from editing. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 21:09, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

LIE. THERE HAS NEVER BEEN ANY BLOCK EVASION. 74.42.44.210 (talk) 21:14, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for block evasion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:18, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

74.42.44.210 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is a shared IP. No block evasion. 74.42.44.210 (talk) 22:00, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The block is working as intended. If you know nothing about it, you can either wait the block out, or request an account at WP:ACC to avoid this problem in the future. 331dot (talk) 23:16, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

74.42.44.210 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

How is the block "working as intended" when you remove legitimate contributions and prevent people from restoring content maliciously deleted by vandals? 74.42.44.210 (talk) 23:22, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 11:10, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If you are evading your block, your edits will not be allowed to stand as that would defeat the purpose of the block. If you want your valid edits to stand, you need to go back to your account and request to be unblocked. Clear vandalism will be reverted by others. 331dot (talk) 01:30, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

74.42.44.210 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not block evading or making disruptive edits.

Decline reason:

This appeal is clearly going nowhere. Talk page access revoked. Optimist on the run (talk) 20:48, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This is block evasion by User:Sugar Bear, who uses many IPs, including this one from Cave Junction, Oregon. Binksternet (talk) 03:57, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Binksternet: This is false. I am not Sugar Bear or block evading. 74.42.44.210 (talk) 19:07, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, 74.42.44.210. You have new messages at I dream of horses's talk page.
Message added 21:15, 22 June 2018 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to You Never Met a Motherfucker Quite Like Me. Aspening (talk) 19:32, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

74.42.44.210 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not Sugar Bear. This accusation is false.

Decline reason:

Talk page access revoked, block extended. 331dot (talk) 20:37, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

June 2018[edit]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for abuse of editing privileges. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. 331dot (talk) 20:37, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

August 2018[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Esham. Block evasion by User:Sugar Bear. Binksternet (talk) 19:30, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

THERE HAS NEVER BEEN ANY BLOCK EVASION. LIAR. 74.42.44.210 (talk) 21:14, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

74.42.44.210 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is a shared IP.

Decline reason:

No evidence in the recent history that this IP has been used by anyone either the intended target of the block. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:15, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

To me, the editing history of 74.42.44.210 looks like just one person, that person being User:Sugar Bear. And the location in Oregon is near a bunch of other Sugar Bear IPs, for instance Special:Contributions/74.42.44.222 blocked last month, the history showing disruption reaching back to 2015. Sugar Bear was recently prevented from using one of his favorite IP ranges, Special:Contributions/166.181.240.0/21, hence the unblock request here. The claim that the IP is shared appears false to me, and the unblock request is not made in good faith. Binksternet (talk) 21:13, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

THAT IS A LIE AND YOU KNOW IT. This imaginary user WHO IS PROBABLY YOU has NEVER USED this public library's IP to edit. 74.42.44.210 (talk) 21:11, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

74.42.44.210 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This IP is for a public library. Not an individual.

Decline reason:

Irrelevant; this IP was still used for engaging in disruption and has been blocked for that reason. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 21:20, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

74.42.44.210 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

(Personal attack removed)

Decline reason:

I see you've already had your talk page access revoked. Good. Yamla (talk) 21:24, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(edit conflict) Uncivil accusations and unblock requests will get you nowhere, except for your talk page access revoked. Speaking of talk page access... yoink! Goodbye. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 21:25, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Are you going to block EVERY IP IN OREGON before you realize that there has NEVER BEEN ANY BLOCK EVASION??? 74.42.44.210 (talk) 21:13, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019[edit]

Do not use multiple IP addresses to vandalize Wikipedia, like you did at Expresso II. Such attempts to avoid detection or circumvent the blocking policy will not succeed. You are welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia but your recent edits have been reverted or removed. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Block evasion by User:Sugar Bear. Binksternet (talk) 22:13, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for block evasion. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. 331dot (talk) 23:42, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

May 2019[edit]

It may not have been your intention, but one of your edits, specifically one that you made on The Cry of Love, may have introduced material that some consider controversial. Due to this, your edits may have been reverted. When adding material that may be controversial, it is good practice to first discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them, to gain consensus over whether or not to include the text, phrasing, etc. If you believe that the information you added was correct, please initiate that discussion. The previous discussion at the article's talk page led to a consensus of having both "studio" and "compilation" types in the infobox. Dan56 (talk) 20:53, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for block evasion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:58, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

74.42.44.210 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is a shared IP on a public library computer. There has been ZERO BLOCK EVASION. It is NOT "the same editor" as any non-fictional blocked user.

Decline reason:

Talk page access revoked. 331dot (talk) 21:16, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This is a SHARED IP. NO ONE HAS EVER USED IT FOR "BLOCK EVASION". IT IS A PUBLIC LIBRARY COMPUTER.

I've briefly semi-protected this page to prevent further implausible ALL CAPS denials that we have previously seen from this IP. It's one thing to claim that you're editing from a shared IP address, but it doesn't make a lick of difference if all of the edits are clearly being made by the same individual.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:17, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As talk page access has been revoked, I've undone my 24 hour semi protection.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:20, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.