User talk:78.129.175.211

April 2008[edit]

I feel like I'm repeating myself over and over. The issue is that sources can be found both for and against listing Flyleaf as Christian rock. No, you cannot put a disputed tag on alternative rock because there are not sources that say that they are not alternative rock, whereas there are several reliable sources that state that they are. GlassCobra 14:27, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not make personal attacks against me. On topic, you appear to be completely missing the point. Please read my above comments more carefully. The reason that only Christian rock is disputed is because there are sources that say that Flyleaf is Christian rock and sources that say that they are not. The reason that alternative should not be tagged as disputed is because while there are some sources that say that Flyleaf is alternative rock and some that say that they are alternative metal, there are none that say that they are not one kind of alternative or the other. Alt rock and alt metal are not mutually exclusive. GlassCobra 15:00, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Further clarification: there are no sources that say, for example, that Flyleaf is alternative rock and not alternative metal. There are sources that say that they are alternative and Christian, and there are sources that say that they are alternative and not Christian, and this is why only Christian rock is disputed. Do you understand the difference? GlassCobra 15:03, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stop patronizing me, I'm not stupid. I more than understand what you are saying. I just simply don't agree with your reasoning. 78.129.175.211 (talk) 15:05, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not trying to patronize you, I'm merely sick of repeating myself. It's all well and good that you don't agree with my reasoning, but edit warring on the article is not the way to go. You need to discuss on the talk page first. GlassCobra 15:09, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Lighter, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Lighter was changed by 78.129.175.211 (u) (t) score equals -1277969 on 2008-04-10T01:47:03+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 01:47, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Premenstrual syndrome, you will be blocked from editing. Gwernol 01:47, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Gwernol 01:48, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.