User talk:78.78.143.46

DS Alert: Eastern Europe

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

_signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:30, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

March 22

You also need to read wp:sock and WP:NOTDUMB.Slatersteven (talk) 10:30, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

I have never denied that my IP has changed, I readily admitted so on the other talk page, here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:78.78.200.165

It was to to you, and you responded to it, so you clearly have read it. I have not claimed to be anyone else, to the contrary.

As for rules, try reading

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_personal_attacks and at this point particularily, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Tendentious_editing#Disputing_the_reliability_of_apparently_good_sources

We are now at 5 rejected secondary sources, 1 rejected bluemarked primary (that's primary of course) and rejection of ICRC as a source on what is a warcrime! Do you really want to argue that this is reasonable and NPOV?

78.78.143.46 (talk) 15:31, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

This is now a warning. Your request to WP:LISTEN and the fact you have now gone way past wp:tenditious tells me you are wp:nothere but a rather here to push an agenda. You have been told exactly why you are engaging in OR and synthesis and your refusal to accept that now makes you a time sink. My next response to you will be at wp:ANI. Slatersteven (talk) 16:01, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

That is no problem at all, I suggest you do let other parties look at this. I just picked a bureaucrat to ask to take a look at this conflict for that same purpose. I would claim that at this point, there is indeed rulebreaking going on, but much more so on your part than on mine.

78.78.143.46 (talk) 16:16, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

---