User talk:80.189.121.239

August 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Global Gathering, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Global Gathering was changed by 80.189.121.239 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-08-09T13:28:21+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 13:28, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Template:Mötley Crüe, you may be blocked from editing. - FlightTime (open channel) 22:39, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Psychotic Supper. Binksternet (talk) 00:37, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I did not "introduce incorrect information". That is the title of the song on the back cover of the album. Here's a photo of the back cover. So don't falsely accuse me of "vandalism". https://archive.org/download/tesla_psychotic_b/tesla_psychotic_b.jpg

The song has a title, and it has a sub-title. You are mixing those things together. Binksternet (talk) 14:37, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia includes the subtitles on pretty much every other article why is Tesla an exception?

Some examples include: "Welcome Home (Sanitarium)", "Living Loving Maid (She's Just a Woman)", "Don't Go Away Mad (Just Go Away)", "(I Can't Get No) Satisfaction", "(Don't Fear) The Reaper", "Exit Music (For a Film)" I could go on. Wikipedia keeps these subtitles intact so why can't the subtitle for the tracks on the Tesla album be included? Wikipedia does seem to have a problem with different pages following different rules.

The Tesla song "Song & Emotion" is not widely shown with its subtitle, unlike your examples. AllMusic doesn't show the subtitle,[1] Spotify doesn't,[2] Sleaze Roxx doesn't,[3] and Deezer doesn't.[4] The LP label doesn't show it,[5] even though the CD label does show it. The inconsistency in sources is why I am standing firm on removing it. It's not universal enough. Binksternet (talk) 19:00, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is why you're better going elsewhere for information about albums. There is no good reason at all to not include the subtitles. They inform the reader that it exists. I added a note stating the subtitles are only on the original pressings. To hide the information completely as though it doesn't exist is just wrong to me and against the entire point of an Encyclopedia. 80.189.121.239 (talk)

This isn't how it works here on Wikipedia. One of the core policies of Wikipedia (WP:RS) states that information should be based on "reliable, published sources". If that piece of information cannot be supported with a source, it generally should not be included. I looked up the title for that song through multiple searchs and could not find a single article or source where the subtitle is included. A link to the picture is not enough to support it. HorrorLover555 (talk) 19:34, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Something not being widely reported doesn't change facts. 80.189.121.239 (talk) 19:29, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You're missing the point. If there are no large sources regarding it and if not covered by published sources such as magazines, newspapers, etc., it should not be included. Please read WP:RS and WP:VERIFY to understand why we have these rules in the first place. Just because an image says so, does not mean that you are right. It's not a fact, it's part of the policy here on Wikipedia. Again, an image is not good enough to cover on it. HorrorLover555 (talk) 00:10, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So basically the correct full title to something that's literally written on the record cannot be used if it's not in magazines and newspapers? I mean you'd be quite hard pressed to find a semi-obscure hard rock album from 1991 being mentioned in any magazines and newspapers these days. So by that logic the album doesn't even exist. 80.189.121.239 (talk) 10:19, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That's not what I am talking about. Also, me and Binksternet have done our best to explain these to you, but it is becoming clear that you are not listening. You seem to treat Wikipedia like a battlefield in which you need to come out on top, even though we have explained that it is not acceptable. Please stop using that image link as your source when we have already disputed that your source is inconsistent. HorrorLover555 (talk) 13:22, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. HorrorLover555 (talk) 14:14, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Winona Ryder. Sundayclose (talk) 17:37, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2023[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia as you did at Mechanix. BoxxyBoy (talk) 22:11, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Putting correct facts in an article is not "vandalism". Metallica released and recorded the song in 1982. Megadeth released it in 1985. Therefore it's a Metallica song not a Megadeth song. Megadeth's version is a cover. Megadeth literally didn't even exist when Mechanix was first released. 80.189.121.239 (talk) 12:17, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Please comment at the newly created Talk page section related to the Mechanix article here: [6]. Thanks, David O. Johnson (talk) 22:01, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as done at Mechanix.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Leyo 22:18, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.