User talk:8090updesh

Hi

About 8090updesh (talk) 10:10, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Updesh Kumar Singh (September 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Updesh Kumar Singh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 14:16, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Updesh Kumar Singh (September 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:ANYBIO, lacks any sources or references. Appears to be an undeclared WP:COI / WP:AUTOBIO.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Updesh Kumar Singh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 06:25, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Updesh Kumar Singh (November 2)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by KylieTastic was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

KylieTastic (talk) 15:43, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article, or a draft for a Wikipedia article, about yourself. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Notable people who have edited Wikipedia). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:33, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 8090updesh,

If you want to be a Wikipedia editor, please work on one of our over 6 million articles instead of concentrating on an article about yourself. You do not meet Wikipedia's notability standards. Maybe one day, in the distant future, but not now. But, luckily, there are plenty of other subjects on Wikipedia that you can contribute to.

If you have questions about editing Wikipedia, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:36, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Updesh Kumar Singh

Hello, 8090updesh. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Updesh Kumar Singh, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:02, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Updesh Kumar Singh

Hello, 8090updesh. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Updesh Kumar Singh".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:23, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Hello, I'm Dhruv edits. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Community development block, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dhruv edits (talk) 03:19, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

hi 8090updesh (talk) 03:23, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i will provide you reliable sources 8090updesh (talk) 03:24, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@8090updesh. Stop adding content without reliable sources to back it up. Dhruv edits (talk) 05:43, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

hi 8090updesh (talk) 03:25, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Community development block, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dhruv edits (talk) 05:47, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please use English everywhere on Wikipedia

I noticed that you have posted comments to the page User talk:Dhruv edits‎ in a language other than English. At the English-language Wikipedia, we try to use English for all comments. Posting all comments in English makes it easier for other editors to join the conversation and help you. If you cannot avoid using another language, then please provide a translation into English, if you can. If you cannot provide a translation, please go to the list of Wikipedias, look in the list for a Wikipedia that is in your language, and edit there instead of here. For more details, see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 09:16, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 09:24, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

8090updesh (talk) 19:25, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

8090updesh (talk) 19:28, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Basically I find no evidence that you are able to edit constructively. This includes your many deleted drafts about yourself, which I'm not even sure were serious after reading them. Your first edit to an article changed "and" to "&", not at all appropriate for an encyclopedia. Your responses above saying "hi" are useless, and your deletion of sourced material and adding unsourced after warnings unacceptable. Doug Weller talk 09:29, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

8090updesh (talk) 19:29, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

8090updesh (talk) 19:31, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

8090updesh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I had taken the data from the government website, the evidence of which was given along with it. 8090updesh (talk) 19:33, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 19:37, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Blanking

You are not permitted to remove declined unblock requests for your currently active block. Do not do so again. --Yamla (talk) 19:45, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Which part of this did you find confusing?!? --Yamla (talk) 21:04, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed to abusive sockpuppeteer, Guruupdesh. --Yamla (talk) 21:11, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla You beat me to it! Doug Weller talk 11:58, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]