User talk:81.101.15.25

June 2020[edit]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Stingray (1964 TV series). Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. SuperMarioMan (Talk) 20:56, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Stingray is from 1964, not 1963.81.101.15.25 (talk) 21:01, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See the sourced text directly above where you were editing: the 99-minute version was "created for Japanese TV executives in 1963", the year in which the bulk of the series was filmed. SuperMarioMan (Talk) 21:08, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020[edit]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Thunderbirds (TV series), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. SuperMarioMan (Talk) 18:24, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Changing UK Nationalities[edit]

Hi. You should read this guidance before further altering nationalities on Wikipedia. Thanks. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 12:32, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please take some time to read the essay Escape_Orbit provided and stop changing nationalities in BLP articles such as Lily James without consensus. Thank you. KyleJoan^talk 09:56, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I will be more careful. And I will provide sources next time.81.101.15.25 (talk)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Lily James, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. KyleJoan^talk 13:26, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020[edit]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Jeremy Hardy, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Tacyarg (talk) 10:38, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 12:32, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

But for Emily Beecham, its not possible to have English citizenship because its not the same to nationalities.81.101.15.25 (talk) 13:48, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nationaity/ethnicity/identity[edit]

Add sources, I left some as after some reading it seemed appropriate.Halbared (talk) 15:19, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ANI[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. SuperMarioMan (Talk) 19:42, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020[edit]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of one month for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 19:53, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

81.101.15.25 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want to talk about this with someone. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.101.15.25 (talk) 20:15, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 22:53, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Why am I still blocked? It's 19:52 on the 29th of August, 2020. 81.101.15.25 (talk) 19:13, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020[edit]

Hello, I'm ZimZalaBim. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Talk:Funny Games (2007 film) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Please stop removing these templates based only on your personal opinion. Engage in a discussion. ZimZalaBim ^talk 20:38, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

It's just that Stoker, Se7en and Funny Games are not horror films.81.101.15.25 (talk) 08:17, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
You have received many warnings about your disruptive reverts. If you continue to revert other users rather than engage in consensus-building discussion with them, as you did here, here and here, this IP address will be re-blocked for an even longer period. The correct procedure is WP:BRD ("Bold, Revert, Discuss") – you made bold edits that others reverted, so the next step is to resolve the disagreement through talk page discussion. SuperMarioMan (Talk) 15:23, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of British films of 2013. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Please wait for discussion on the talk pages you started before making these changes. ZimZalaBim ^talk 19:08, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Thunderbirds Are Go. SuperMarioMan (Talk) 11:26, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 22:26, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.