User talk:82.136.210.153/Archive 4

This is an archive of past discussions about User:82.136.210.153. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Your submission at Articles for creation: Valay Shende has been accepted

Valay Shende, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Winner 42 Talk to me! 22:25, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Your advice to 79.132.239.87

Apparently you advised 79.132.239.87 to contact her draft's past reviewers. There is no requirement that a draft be reviewed again by one of the previous reviewers, and I, for one, usually prefer not to review the same draft multiple times and to have some new eyes on the page instead. It would have been more useful to advise her to re-submit the draft. Huon (talk) 21:03, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

The draft in question has already been declined three times. In my opinion it would be painful to see it being rejected a fourth time. This is why I think the draft's editor needs (editors need) to ask for sufficient feedback before resubmitting the draft. I think that reviewers who previously declined the draft are already somewhat familiar with the subject and may therefore be suitable candidates to evaluate whether past deficiencies have been addressed. I suggested to 79.132.239.87 that it might be a good idea to ask one or more experienced editors to evaluate the draft before resubmitting it for an actual AfC review. I'm aware that there is no requirement that a draft be reviewed again by one of the previous reviewers, and it makes sense that you prefer not to review the same draft multiple times. I don't think it's wise to resubmit a draft that has been rejected three times for a fourth review before one or more experienced editors have given a quick glance over the article to see whether it's likely to pass another review. The experienced editor does not need to be you - or any of the past reviewers. --82.136.210.153 (talk) 21:45, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lutz Bachmann has been accepted

Lutz Bachmann, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

CorporateM (Talk) 20:03, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Lutz Bachmann

On 26 February 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lutz Bachmann, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that a photo of Lutz Bachmann dressed as Adolf Hitler sparked controversy before his resignation as leader of Pegida, an anti-Islam organisation? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lutz Bachmann. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:01, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Precious

good faith IP
Thank you, member of the association ogf good faith, for quality articles such as Nas: Time Is Illmatic and Lutz Bachmann, for good advice such as "I don't think it's wise to resubmit a draft that has been rejected three times for a fourth review before ...", for "Fixing the Quotefarm problem" and providing the better image, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:58, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Thanks Gerda. :) --82.136.210.153 (talk) 10:29, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Book of Unwritten Tales 2 has been accepted

The Book of Unwritten Tales 2, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

— kikichugirl ^oh hello! 23:13, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

This is an archive of past discussions about User:82.136.210.153. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.