User talk:82.25.126.28

Can you just unblock me???[edit]

Ok whoever blocked me, should unblock me right now! I never wanna be blocked again! I did nothing wrong to be blocked and fact it was classified as vandalism is just disgusting! I am just sick and tired of this. This is my 3rd Time I have been blocked and all of them were for no reason! I do not get this and I hope it never happens again!

This is my job, alright?![edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

82.25.126.28 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Ok whoever blocked me, should unblock me right now! I never wanna be blocked again! I did nothing wrong to be blocked and fact it was classified as vandalism is just disgusting! I am just sick and tired of this. This is my 3rd Time I have been blocked and all of them were for no reason!I do not get this and I hope it never happens again!82.25.126.28 (talk) 21:28, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No understanding of why you were blocked or evidence the issues wouldn't continue when unblocked Amortias (T)(C) 22:35, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Just Unblock Me Already! Iv'e Been waiting ages...[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

82.25.126.28 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is my Job and Iv'e been blocked for no reason, all edits I made were not vandalism but the Bot classified it as that! I feel insulted and demand to be unblocked right away!82.25.126.28 (talk) 21:28, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

duplicate request Amortias (T)(C) 22:37, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I did nothing wrong, OK?![edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

82.25.126.28 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Just Unblock me I did nothing wrong and all images in the gallery I put were truth. I don't get where this is vandalism?! Im sick and tired of whoever puts these blocks on me! Is this some kind of a troll or are just insulting my intelligence?! I am not happy and devasted since this is m third time being blocked for no reason! 82.25.126.28 (talk) 21:35, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Duplicate request Amortias (T)(C) 22:38, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello im still blocked!![edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

82.25.126.28 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Just Unblock me I did nothing wrong and all images in the gallery I put were truth. I don't get where this is vandalism?! Im sick and tired of whoever puts these blocks on me! Is this some kind of a troll or are just insulting my intelligence?! I am not happy and devasted since this is m third time being blocked for no reason! 82.25.126.28 (talk) 21:35, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Duplicate request Amortias (T)(C) 22:39, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

When do I get a vote on this?![edit]

I believe I should be unblocked, I don't even know why TF I got blocked. No I didn't do vandalism or scam. This is genuinely what does places look like. Im am sick and tired of being blocked! This is actually stupid. Either unblock me or at least revent back to my edits on Chłapowo, Pomeranian Voivodeship and Jastarnia. If you are too lazy to do it or you think like it's "Vandalism" then just unblock me, how much longer will I have to wait till I convince you?!

I AM IMPATIENT, JUST UNBLOCK ME!!![edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

82.25.126.28 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I believe I should be unblocked, I don't even know why TF I got blocked. No I didn't do vandalism or scam. This is genuinely what does places look like. Im am sick and tired of being blocked! This is actually stupid. Either unblock me or at least revent back to my edits on Chłapowo, Pomeranian Voivodeship and Jastarnia. If you are too lazy to do it or you think like it's "Vandalism" then just unblock me, how much longer will I have to wait till I convince you?!82.25.126.28 (talk) 21:28, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Duplicate request Amortias (T)(C) 22:40, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

MY GOD, IS IT THAT HARD?! >:([edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

82.25.126.28 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

HOW LONG DO I HAVE TO WAIT TILL I GET UNBLOCKED! I GOT BLOCKED FOR NO REASON IT'S THAT Chip3004 GUY WHO BLOCKED ME AND REVERTED MY EDITS. HE THINKS IT'S "VANDALISM" WHICH ANNOYS ME THE MOST. YOU ADMINS THINK YOU CAN DO ANYTHING JUST BECAUSE YOU HAVE THE PRIVELEGE TO. I THINK YOU SHOULD JUST UNBLOCK ME!!82.25.126.28 (talk) 21:28, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Duplicate request Amortias (T)(C) 22:41, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.

Disabling talk page access. If another administrator wants to respond to one of the unblock requests, they can restore the talk page. EdJohnston (talk) 22:23, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

EdJohnston Declined the first one as no grounds given that they understand the block reason or wont just carry on. Further requests declined due to duplication. Dont see any reason to restore talk page access. Amortias (T)(C) 22:42, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And since the IP claimed that editing Wikipedia is his job [1], he still needs to answer my request for clarification [2]. Meters (talk) 00:19, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

At it again[edit]

It looks like you have resumed the image-related disruption for which you were previously blocked. Please stop, or you'll be blocked again. Favonian (talk) 11:31, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I recommend a one-year block of this IP with talk page disabled, based on the record thus far. They could still use UTRS to appeal. EdJohnston (talk) 20:10, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for Disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.

Per the explanations above. EdJohnston (talk) 04:47, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jordan Sweeto (July 24)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bearcat was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The references here are not reliable sources for the purposes of establishing that he's notable enough for an encyclopedia article.
You cannot reference a musician's notability to his own self-published social networking content on Twitter or Facebook, YouTube videos, Spotify streams, or user-generated websites like TVTropes.
The only kind of sourcing that is acceptable is third-party journalist written coverage about him in real media -- but the only source of that type here is the ABC News hit, and it takes a lot more than just one of those to get a person in the wikidoor.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jordan Sweeto and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bearcat (talk) 15:31, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 82.25.126.28! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bearcat (talk) 15:31, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Jade Raymond has been reverted.
Your edit here to Jade Raymond was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline (see also this list of frequently-discussed sources). The reference(s) you added or changed (https://playstation-studios.fandom.com/wiki/Haven_Studios) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 00:46, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.