Jump to content

User talk:86.147.210.198

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

July 2024

[edit]

Information icon Hello! I'm NorthropChicken. Your recent edit(s) to the page Alex Chalk appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. That title is no longer in use. NorthropChicken (talk) 17:17, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lord High Chancellor of Great Britain is the formal title of Lord Chancellor 86.147.210.198 (talk) 17:18, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Block Evasion

[edit]

WP:BLOCKEVASION: "Anyone is free to revert any edits made in violation of a ban or block, without giving any further reason and without regard to the three-revert rule. This does not mean that edits must be reverted just because they were made by a banned editor (changes that are obviously helpful, such as fixing typos or undoing vandalism, can be allowed to stand), but the presumption in ambiguous cases should be to revert." Jean-de-Nivelle (talk) 17:23, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK, but also you should have some consistency regarding the Lord Chancellors, let us come to a compromise, Infobox officeholder all Lord Chancellors shall have Lord High Chancellor of Great Britain even with Justice Secretary, but with the Monarch of the Day. Do you agree to that? 86.147.210.198 (talk) 17:30, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's not for me to agree or disagree. There should be a proper discussion on the UK politics project page about the correct format, and as a blocked editor, you can't be party to that discussion. I admire and understand your commitment to consistency, but you don't have a right to impose your preferences on the project. Jean-de-Nivelle (talk) 17:34, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Could you make a case on it also can you check on List of hereditary peers of the House of Lords since 1999 as it should be List of hereditary peers elected under the House of Lords Act 1999 86.147.210.198 (talk) 18:04, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Look, this really isn't my area of expertise, and I'm not going to cooperate in helping you evade your block. I've already wasted a sunny afternoon chasing you around Wikipedia, and I'm really losing the will to continue. It's clear that we're both wasting a lot of each other's time at present. I've no personal objection to the changes you suggest, but I do object to the way you're making them. That said, I do appreciate your willingness to talk. Jean-de-Nivelle (talk) 18:26, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you 86.147.210.198 (talk) 18:28, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]