User talk:86.89.77.70

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

86.89.77.70 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by a collocation web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. My IP address is 86.89.77.70. 86.89.77.70 (talk) 17:41, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This IP is not currently blocked. If you are still unable to edit, please include the exact message you see when you attempt to edit in a new unblock request below. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:45, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

February 2021

Hello, I'm Shinyedit. I noticed that you recently removed content from SCO without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Shinyedit^bonjour. 19:44, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Shinyedit, please actually look at the diff and read my edit summary. Hopefully you will realise that your revert - as well as your above message on my talk page (you should read your message back and compare it to the diff) - was completely inappropriate and self-revert. Please be a lot more careful in the future not to abuse the undo function. Also be very careful that your (automatically generated) talk page messages are grounded in truth; if you often make false accusations against other editors (including IPs), that will get you into trouble eventually (similarly for recklessly pressing "undo"). Thanks. 86.89.77.70 (talk) 21:52, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Shinyedit, I have placed back your warning so it is visible what I'm replying to. I was asking you to self-revert your revert at the SCO page. 86.89.77.70 (talk) 22:08, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ponyo reverted it already. Shinyedit^bonjour. 22:09, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Shinyedit OK, then all's well. Please be more careful in the future ;) (I do mean it though) 86.89.77.70 (talk) 22:16, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.