User talk:88800

There should be little doubt that this is the IP 67.101.146.117 attempting to circumvent 3RR. CovenantD 13:58, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Budget[edit]

BOM.com is using the 50-70 million estimation of what all the Canceled Superman films cost. No one knows for sure exactly what those films cost, so they estimated it. Bom.com shouldn't be using that number. The same goes for their listing of 225 million for Pirates 2 & 3. They are using an estimated figure of 450 million that was released before even the first sequel had started filming. The source said that they estimated the budget for Pirates 2 & 3 would be 450 million, and BOM.com took that to mean that it was 225 million for each film. The problem with that is that most films don't go exactly to budget numbers, they either come up just short or go over, and it's highly unlikely that they would stop exactly at 225 million, especially if they need more money. BOM.com doesn't do a lot of research. I provided the numbers.com with the source that gave them the 204 million, because Bryan Singer is quoted directly as saying that was the budget. No one has confirmed the Pirates budget, and the X-Men 3 budget I have seen at 150 million, 210 million...it's an "iffy" too. Bignole 04:43, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, IMDb, which is no longer considered "reliable" when it comes to recent/future movies, get's it's information from fan submitted info, and was taken from BOM.com. Check the Superman Returns page for the link to the Bryan Singer quote. I take Singer's words over speculation on BOM.com anyday. Bignole 04:46, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:University Belt.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:University Belt.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:08, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Block[edit]

You have been blocked for using this account to circumvent 3rr, see User_talk:67.101.96.148. Mak (talk) 04:29, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

what? there must be some mistake?88800 06:41, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Pnu.JPG[edit]

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Pnu.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:35, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:SanBedaCollege.JPG[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:SanBedaCollege.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Jusjih (talk) 04:38, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]