User talk:92.234.193.240

August 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm MelbourneStar. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Waterloo Road (series 9), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 10:28, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Waterloo Road (series 9), without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 10:39, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Waterloo Road (series 9), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 10:56, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, 92.234.193.240. You have new messages at MelbourneStar's talk page.
Message added 11:07, 25 August 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

—MelbourneStar☆^talk 11:07, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, as you did at User talk:MelbourneStar, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 11:24, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for repeatedly adding unsourced claims to articles. In response to a question (that followed some unecessary incivility) on another user's talk page--yes, you do need sources to verify information you add to Wikipedia. That's basically the foundation of how we work. If you don't have sources, then the info can't be added. The sources need to meet our guideline for reliable sources. Now, if you're willing to do that, you can be unblocked immediately, but you have to agree to stop fighting to get your unsourced version into the encyclopedia. If you don't know how to format references, that's fine someone can teach you. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Qwyrxian (talk) 11:52, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:00, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm Flyer22. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to The Walking Dead (season 4), because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Flyer22 (talk) 15:16, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Grand Theft Auto V characters with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A m i t 웃 15:57, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Waterloo Road (series 8)[edit]

Please discuss the edit you reverted at Waterloo Road (series 8) at Talk:Waterloo Road (series 8). Thanks, U-Mos (talk) 19:50, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Waterloo Road (series 9), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 23:05, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Grand Theft Auto V characters[edit]

Hey there. As you may have noticed, your edits the List of Grand Theft Auto V characters article have been reverted, multiple times, with the edit summaries asking you to stop. It has now reached the point of frustration, where action must be taken. I understand that your edits are probably done in good faith, however once you're asked to stop, you stop, and if you feel as if your edits are constructive, you take it to the talk page, or you explain in the edit summary. The surname of Michael and his family is likely to be "de Santa", as with Franklin's surname as "Clinton", however that is only leaked information, something that Wikipedia does not trust. I also understand that Trevor's surname was basically confirmed in the trailer, however he may have meant "Trevor Phillips Enterprises" as in a partnership between himself and someone called Phillip, or it may be his actual surname (which seems more likely). However, Rockstar may have decided to change it since then, and they have not made an official confirmation, which is what we need on Wikipedia.

I'm sorry that your edits were reverted, but basically all of your edits contained unconfirmed, unsourced and/or leaked information, all of which are not suitable ways to edit Wikipedia. Please stop with your edits, or I will take action against your account, as the page is being dealt with. Thank you. --Rhain1999 (talk) 00:58, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Walking Dead[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on The Walking Dead (TV series). Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.67.170.169.30 (talk) 10:19, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring. Every time you do this, we're going to reblock you, and the blocks will get longer each time. I suggest instead that next time you find your edits being reverted, you go to the article's talk page and discuss the issue.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Qwyrxian (talk) 13:30, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Waterloo Road (series 9)[edit]

I notice from your user talk that you have been given warnings regarding your edits to the Waterloo Road articles in the past. If you continue to incorrectly edit, copy information directly from websites without regard for the rules of editing on Wikipedia or vandalize these articles again, you will be blocked from editing. 92.24.152.139 (talk) 09:20, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for continuation of the same problems that got you blocked before. And since you said on another IP's talk page that you don't care if you're blocked, well, this shouldn't be a problem. Just note that if you start up again in a month, I'll just re-block you, for longer.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Qwyrxian (talk) 14:41, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2013[edit]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Waterloo Road (series 9), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You've been repeatedly asked to stop adding unsourced content to articles. You won't be asked again —MelbourneStar☆^talk 13:58, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of Benidorm episodes may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:49, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014[edit]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Waterloo Road (TV series), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. ——MelbourneStar☆^talk 02:18, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm RA0808. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Waterloo Road (series 9) with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. RA0808 ^talk _contribs 15:47, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.