User talk:92.239.205.101

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ².O.^Boxing 13:37, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ².O.^Boxing 15:40, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. ².O.^Boxing 16:27, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. ².O.^Boxing 22:28, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, such as the ones you made to Dereck Chisora. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create a named account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

Create new pages and rename pages
Edit semi-protected pages
Upload images
Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

Note that in order for the first three features to be available, you must have had an account for a certain number of days and made a certain number of edits.

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (92.239.205.101) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Happy editing! JC7V-talk 15:11, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

june 2019[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Dereck Chisora and Dereck Chisora and Francois Botha. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. SWAGnificient (talk) 21:18, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

create and account and follow the rules. if youre just some vandalizing suckpuppet, then just buzz off. your additions are not needed and are not appreciated. SWAGnificient (talk) 21:37, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019[edit]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Grayfell (talk) 22:15, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello? You there? Please discuss at Talk:Dereck Chisora, not in edit summaries. I do not think you are trolling, but you are edit warring. Your IP will be blocked if you continue. Grayfell (talk) 22:33, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Grayfell the IP clearly ignored your warning of reverting in his latest revert on Dereck Chisora. And is a no show on talk. He has no interest in concensus. SWAGnificient (talk) 00:15, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This IP has not edited since my most recent post. If they resume edit warring, go to WP:AN3. Grayfell (talk) 00:20, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Sam Sexton; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.--Michig (talk) 18:40, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

Sam Sexton[edit]

If you continue to revert Squared.Circle.Boxing's edits on Sam Sexton as you stated that you intended to do, you will probably be blocked for edit warring. Please attempt to discuss the issue on the article's talk page instead. Thanks, aboideau^talk 20:56, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Squared.Circle.Boxing should stop reverting my edits. as I do not see how I should be blocked for edit warring when it is him who is the one who is continuing this.

Both of you are edit warring (and are each at three reverts right now), but you will be the one continuing it if you plan to "continue to undo all [his] unconstructive edits untill [he gets] the message that [he is] wrong." aboideau^talk 22:30, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The bottom line is that I will ONLY undo his unconstructive edits if he is indeed the one continuing to revert any edits I make endlessly, I have absolutely no intention whatsoever of edit warring at all, I just simply take exception to having my edits removed over and over by one individual without any just cause. Feel free to look at any and every one of my edits that I have made while on Wikipedia. none of which have been vandalising and have all added constructive content to the pages. I apologise profusely if I am appearing rude or stubborn in any way I merely thoroughly enjoying adding to and updating the pages of boxers I have followed for years on end and seeing virtually every edit I make removed is very frustrating. For a long time no edits I made were every removed but now it appears that the same individual is undoing lots of content I have contributed since I have been on here.

Dereck Chisora[edit]

Discuss your issue with the constructive edits made on the Dereck Chisora page instead of needlessly reverting edits without explanation. ².O.^Boxing 15:12, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019[edit]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for edit warring.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 17:56, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.