User talk:95.103.142.252

August 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Little Gem, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 22:52, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What's my research? Specifically, not a general phrase where you don't state anything relevant. Specifically what you personally have a problem with. 95.103.142.252 (talk) 23:13, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Do not write that in Wikipedia voice. Use a quote, with English translation. See WP:RSUEQ. Adakiko (talk) 02:08, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

you troll quote yourself:

SaS a PS: Kuffa musí skončiť

Štátny tajomník ministerstva životného prostredia Štefa Kuffa hulvátsky prerušil divadelné predstavenie a po tomto škandále musí okamžite skončiť. Uviedla to opozičná strana Sloboda a Solidarita (SaS) na sociálnej sieti.

„Síce berie pekný plat, má podriadených, kanceláriu a šoféra, ale neexistuje jediný dôkaz, že vo svojom pracovnom čase niečo aj spravil. Preto má čas chodiť po Slovensku a terorizovať ľudí," napísala strana.

Zároveň pripomenula, že Štefan Kuffa bol chvíľu štátnym tajomníkom na ministerstve kultúry, nevydržal tam však dlho. „Pre jeho extrémistické a nevhodné správanie ho museli preložiť. Okrem iného je Štefan Kuffa známy tým, že neakceptuje iný názor, neznáša slobodných ľudí, homosexuálov by chcel utopiť, chcel na Slovensku intronizovať Ježiša a spolu so svojimi synmi občas zmlátia farmárov," uviedla SaS.

Podľa liberálov sa v nedeľu totalitné predstavy ľudí z okolia ministra životného prostredia Tomáša Tarabu (nom. SNS) a ministerky kultúry Martiny Šimkovičovej (nom. SNS) opäť úplne obnažili.

Šéf poslaneckého klubu Progresívneho Slovenska v Národnej rade Martin Dubéci na sociálnej sieti uviedol: „S hrôzou som si prečítal o tom, čo sa stalo herečkám košického Národného divadla v Malej Frankovej. Prerušiť divadelné predstavenie je výsostne neúctivé k umelcom, no od Kuffovcov sme na takéto správanie už zvyknutí. Samozvaný cenzor Štefan Kuffa nemal najmenšie právo akokoľvek zasahovať do predstavenia a hovoriť ľuďom, čo majú robiť, či pre koho je divadelné predstavenie určené. Táto vláda ich len ďalej presviedča o tom, že si môžu robiť, čo chcú a že ich názor je jediný správny. Zákazy predstavení sme tu už raz v histórii mali, nesmie sa to opakovať."

„Kuffa si očividne pomýlil rolu štátneho tajomníka vlády demokratickej krajiny so stredovekou rolou inkvizítora," uviedla v stanovisku podpredsedníčka PS Zora Jaurová. Dodala, že takéto správanie vysokých štátnych predstaviteľov si nepamätá ani z čias vlády Vladimíra Mečiara.

Podpredsedníčka Výboru Národnej rady SR pre pôdohospodárstvo a životné prostredie Tamara Stohlová (PS) zdôraznila, že neexistuje dôkaz akejkoľvek jeho práce za mesiace na poste štátneho tajomníka envirorezortu. „Namiesto toho chodí po Slovensku a hovorí ľuďom, na čo sa smú a nesmú pozerať. Po divákoch vykrikuje, aby sa mu ospravedlnili, keď sa voči jeho správaniu ozvú, a divadelný personál necháva príkazom protizákonne bez ich súhlasu natáčať," uviedla a vyslovila názor, že Kuffa je opitý mocou a jeho „papalášistické a inkvizičné správanie prekročilo všetky medze".

Exministerka kultúry za hnutie OĽaNO (dnes hnutie Slovensko) Natália Milanová uviedla, že je nebezpečné, ak sa predstaviteľ štátu, ktorý má v prvom rade slúžiť ľuďom, „zaháňa kladivom na čarodejnice" a chce brániť všetkému, čo nespĺňa jeho predstavy. „Umenie vždy bolo a vždy bude slobodné. Aj keď muselo v histórii prežívať ťažké časy, pretrvalo a pretrvá. Problém s ním môžu mať iba radikáli, ktorí majú strach," uviedla na sociálnej sieti.

„Zjavne sa Kuffa nedokáže ovládať. Dnes chcú zakázať divadlo, zajtra slobodu slova," poukazuje SaS a vyzvala ministra Tarabu, aby Štefanovi Kuffovi odobral funkciu štátneho tajomníka.

Aj podľa názoru progresívcov Kuffovo správanie počas predstavenia dokazuje, že nie je spôsobilý zastávať akúkoľvek verejnú funkciu. Hnutie PS ho vyzýva na odstúpenie, ak tak Kuffa nespraví, plánuje sa hnutie obrátiť so žiadosťou o jeho odvolanie na ministra životného prostredia Tomáša Tarabu.

Čítajte viac: https://spis.korzar.sme.sk/c/23372199/statny-tajomnik-kuffa-prerusil-divadelne-predstavenie-provokacie-cenzura-vravi-herecka.html

"Štátny tajomník ministerstva životného prostredia Štefan Kuffa na nevhodnosť tohto predstavenia pre maloletých upozornil, čoho dôsledkom bol fyzickú útok na jeho osobu. Chceme preto odsúdiť akékoľvek násilie na kultúrnych podujatiach a zdôrazniť potrebu dôsledného a zodpovedného správania organizátorov pri verejných podujatiach. Ak je nejaké predstavenie vhodné pre vekovú kategóriu 18 +, nie je prípustné, aby bolo voľne dostupné pre deti a mladistvých. Na túto skutočnosť dlhodobo upozorňuje aj ministerka kultúry Martina Šimkovičová," informovala za rezort jeho hovorkyňa Petra Bačinská.

Čítajte viac: https://spis.korzar.sme.sk/c/23372199/statny-tajomnik-kuffa-prerusil-divadelne-predstavenie-provokacie-cenzura-vravi-herecka.html 95.103.142.252 (talk) 11:05, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Little Gem, you may be blocked from editing. The wp:onus is on you to follow policy and use a quote, not me to fix your edits. Adakiko (talk) 11:35, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Little Gem. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Adakiko (talk) 11:39, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

you've got full paragraphs from the source, quote. Instead, you repeatedly delete data backed up by sources given by me. Use a translator and quote. I know, your job is political vandalism. 95.103.142.252 (talk) 13:15, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Little Gem. Gaismagorm (talk) 13:08, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

you've got full paragraphs from the source, quote. Instead, you repeatedly delete data backed up by sources given by me. Use a translator and quote. I know, your job is political vandalism. 95.103.142.252 (talk) 13:33, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. Gaismagorm (talk) 13:34, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ⇌ Jake Wartenberg 13:39, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is in response to:

You are blocked, not banned. There is a difference. And the specific content of edit is not why you were blocked. You were blocked for deeming its removal "vandalism"(disagreement with your edits is not vandalism) and disruptively edit warring to preserve your edit instead of engaging in discussion on the talk page. Someone else will review your request. 331dot

Account Savetheinternets repeatedly deleted two sentences, for no reason. Then Adakiko repeatedly deleted them for no reason. He then deleted those two sentences without giving a reason Gaismagorm.

They have here, also in the comments posted by me

1. source

2. the original text in Slovak language

3. the English translation

4. an invitation that when they delete it, to write their summary

Wikipedia's reaction - I got banned. Nobody processed the published text, nobody published the position of the Slovak Republic, represented by the Ministry of Culture, nobody processed the sourced articles, nobody processed the statement why those two sentences were deleted multiple times, nobody even Jake Wartenberg, jpgordon, 331dot.

Why are you so bothered by the position of the Ministry of Culture of the Slovak Republic and also by the summary of the opposition's reactions?

Why doesn't anyone do a summary of the 6 accounts from the long canon articles saying amongst other things that the police and others are dealing with this (by the way, several people got immediate sackings, for example for physically assaulting the Secretary of State and comparing him to the Gestapo), but you're bothered by my two sentences where 6 accounts can't write what's wrong with them apart from, supposedly, it's my research with no sourcing. The opinion of the Ministry of Culture of the Slovak Republic is obviously not considered a source.

The 6 wikipedia accounts censor the official opinion of the Ministry of Culture of the Slovak Republic. Fantastic!

For the entire 5 days it has been publicly available, wikipedia has refused to publish it. It wants neither the summary nor the full opinion. Amazing.

Wikipedia will be without the official opinion of an official state authority. Fantastic!

I'll just wait to see how long you guys censor it.

How long will Wikipedia insist on not publishing the position of the Ministry of Culture of the Slovak Republic.

You could have completed the article a long time ago. Instead you are making up reasons why I got banned.

I wrote to two trolls:

"You could have completed the article a long time ago. Instead you are making up reasons why I got banned.

I wrote to two trolls, "

You could have completed the article a long time ago. Instead, you are making up reasons. The reaction of an organized group of political trolls? Repeatedly deleting my 2 sentences that they didn't replace with anything else. It's simply their job to keep that information out of wikipedia.

They did it so that not one of them exceeded the number of edits, deletions.

If I were an admin of a project, I would be dealing with the problem of a mass organized group of vandals. But wikipedia administrators have a different role. To protect organized groups of political vandals.

For several days, neither of those accounts added a word to the article. Not one!

They didn't put their sentence in there, they didn't put better wording in there, they didn't put anything in there except the destruction of information that was inconvenient for them.

Has anyone supplemented the opinion of the Ministry of Culture of the Slovak Republic? No one. Why?

Has anyone supplemented the article with more information that followed the next few days? No.

Apparently, a number of accounts were interested in the article.

I think that's weird. 6 accounts to me deletes 2 sentences, but none of those accounts adds new information to the article. For example, that the Prime Minister's adviser was given an immediate dismissal.

He called the Secretary of State, a Gestapo, because he wanted young 7-8 year olds not to watch a sex show that is intended for adults, 18+.

Such interest in this article, and no one adds this information?

Where are the 3 accounts that deleted my 2 sentences in the organized group? After all, by all accounts, they had a tremendous interest in the subject.

Or did they just get their way, wikipedia censoring information inconvenient for them? 95.103.142.252 (talk) 11:31, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

95.103.142.252 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

all of this text, I have summarized in two sentences that have repeatedly been deleted, despite being from the source, and have been deleted for political reasons with fabricated reasons. I'm not going to quote 3 paragraphs when the source is given and the information what is in that source. It's been deleted repeatedly for purely political reasons. The trolls made no effort to own the text, only to not post what they are politically uncomfortable with.

SaS and PS: Kuffa must quit

State Secretary of the Ministry of the Environment Štefa Kuffa rudely interrupted the theatrical performance and after this scandal he must quit immediately. The opposition party Sloboda a Solidarita (SaS) said this on social media.

"Although he takes a nice salary, has subordinates, an office and a chauffeur, there is not a single proof that he did anything in his working hours. That is why he has time to go around Slovakia and terrorise people," the party wrote.

It also recalled that Štefan Kuffa was for a while state secretary at the Ministry of Culture, but he did not last long there. "Because of his extremist and inappropriate behaviour, he had to be transferred. Among other things, Štefan Kuffa is known for not accepting other opinions, hating free people, wanting to drown homosexuals, wanting to enthrone Jesus in Slovakia and, together with his sons, sometimes beating up farmers," SaS said.

According to the liberals, on Sunday the totalitarian ideas of the people around Environment Minister Tomáš Taraba (SNS nom.) and Culture Minister Martina Šimkovičová (SNS nom.) were once again laid bare.

"The State Secretary of the Ministry of the Environment, Stefan Kuffa, pointed out the unsuitability of this performance for minors, which resulted in a physical assault on his person. We therefore want to condemn any violence at cultural events and stress the need for consistent and responsible behaviour by organisers at public events. If a performance is suitable for the 18+ age group, it is not acceptable for it to be freely available to children and young

The self-appointed censor Stefan Kuffa had not the slightest right to interfere in any way with the performance and tell people what to do or for whom the theatre performance was intended. This government is only further convincing them that they can do whatever they want and that their opinion is the only correct one. We've had performance bans here once before in history, it must not happen again."

"Kuffa has clearly confused the role of a secretary of state in the government of a democratic country with the medieval role of an inquisitor," PS deputy chairwoman Zora Jaurová said in a statement. She added that she did not remember such behaviour by high-ranking state officials even from the time of Vladimír Mečiar's government.

Tamara Stohlová (PS), deputy chairwoman of the National Council's Committee on Agriculture and Environment, stressed that there was no evidence of any work he had done in his months as state secretary of the environment ministry. "Instead, he goes around telling people what they can and cannot look at. He shouts at the audience to apologise to him when they speak out against his behaviour, and he orders theatre staff to film illegally without their consent," she said, expressing the view that Kuffa is drunk with power and his "papalistic and inquisitorial behaviour has crossed all boundaries".

Natália Milanová, a former culture minister for the OĽaNO movement (now Movement Slovakia), said it was dangerous if a representative of the state, which is supposed to serve the people first and foremost, "swings a sledgehammer at witches" and wants to defend everything that does not meet his ideas. "Art has always been and will always be free. Although it has had to live through difficult times in history, it has endured and will endure. Only radicals who are afraid can have a problem with it," she said on the social network.

"Clearly Kuffa can't control himself. Today they want to ban theatre, tomorrow freedom of speech," SaS points out and called on Minister Taraba to remove Štefan Kuffa from his position as State Secretary.

Also in the opinion of the progressives, Kuff's behaviour during the performance proves that he is unfit to hold any public office. The PS movement is calling for his resignation, and if Kuffa fails to do so, the movement plans to appeal to Environment Minister Tomas Taraba to have him removed.

DISTRICTS. Culture Minister Martina Šimkovičová has also been pointing out this fact for a long time," the ministry's spokeswoman Petra Bačinská said.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you:
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 15:13, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

95.103.142.252 (talk) 14:44, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My sentence, which has been repeatedly deleted: Children should not have been present at this performance at all.

Ministry Statement:

"The State Secretary of the Ministry of the Environment, Stefan Kuffa, pointed out the unsuitability of this performance for minors, which resulted in a physical assault on his person. We therefore want to condemn any violence at cultural events and stress the need for consistent and responsible behaviour by organisers at public events. If a performance is suitable for the 18+ age group, it is not acceptable for it to be freely available to children and minors. The Minister of Culture Martina Šimkovičová has also been pointing out this fact for a long time," Petra Bačinská, spokeswoman for the Ministry, said.

My sentence, which has been repeatedly deleted: The whole thing is being used as an artificial political attack by the opposition on a member of the governing coalition.

Only part of the opposition's statements:

SaS and PS: Kuffa must quit

State Secretary of the Ministry of the Environment Štefa Kuffa rudely interrupted the theatrical performance and after this scandal he must quit immediately. The opposition party Sloboda a Solidarita (SaS) said this on social media.

"Although he takes a nice salary, has subordinates, an office and a chauffeur, there is not a single proof that he did anything in his working hours. That is why he has time to go around Slovakia and terrorise people," the party wrote.

It also recalled that Štefan Kuffa was for a while state secretary at the Ministry of Culture, but he did not last long there. "Because of his extremist and inappropriate behaviour, he had to be transferred. Among other things, Štefan Kuffa is known for not accepting other opinions, hating free people, wanting to drown homosexuals, wanting to enthrone Jesus in Slovakia and, together with his sons, sometimes beating up farmers," SaS said.

According to the liberals, on Sunday the totalitarian ideas of the people around Environment Minister Tomáš Taraba (SNS nom.) and Culture Minister Martina Šimkovičová (SNS nom.) were once again laid bare.

Martin Dubéci, the head of the Progressive Slovakia parliamentary club in the National Council, said on social media, "I was horrified to read about what happened to the actresses of the National Theatre in Košice in Mala Franka. It is highly disrespectful to the artists to interrupt a theatre performance, but we are used to such behaviour from the Kuffs. The self-appointed censor Štefan Kuffa had not the slightest right to interfere in any way with the performance and tell people what to do or for whom the theatre performance was intended. This government is only further convincing them that they can do whatever they want and that their opinion is the only correct one. We've had performance bans here once before in history, it must not happen again."

"Kuffa has clearly confused the role of a secretary of state in the government of a democratic country with the medieval role of an inquisitor," PS deputy chairwoman Zora Jaurová said in a statement. She added that she did not remember such behaviour by high-ranking state officials even from the time of Vladimír Mečiar's government.

Tamara Stohlová (PS), vice-chair of the National Council's Committee on Agriculture and Environment, stressed that there is no evidence of any work he has done in the months he has been State Secretary of the Environment Ministry. "Instead, he goes around telling people what they can and cannot look at. He shouts at the audience to apologise to him when they speak out against his behaviour, and he orders theatre staff to film illegally without their consent," she said, expressing the view that Kuffa is drunk with power and his "papalistic and inquisitorial behaviour has crossed all boundaries".

Natália Milanová, a former culture minister for the OĽaNO movement (now Movement Slovakia), said it was dangerous if a representative of the state, which is supposed to serve the people first and foremost, "swings a sledgehammer at witches" and wants to defend everything that does not meet his ideas. "Art has always been and will always be free. Although it has had to live through difficult times in history, it has endured and will endure. Only radicals who are afraid can have a problem with it," she said on the social network.

"Clearly Kuffa cannot control himself. Today they want to ban theatre, tomorrow freedom of speech," SaS pointed out and called on Minister Taraba to remove Stefan Kuffa from his post as State Secretary.

Also in the opinion of the progressives, Kuff's behaviour during the performance proves that he is unfit to hold any public office. The PS movement is calling for his resignation, and if Kuffa fails to do so, the movement plans to appeal to Environment Minister Tomas Taraba to have him removed.

So I don't know, am I supposed to quote a million text, instead of a one-sentence summary with a link to the text? 95.103.142.252 (talk) 14:53, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

95.103.142.252 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The fact that you blocked me doesn't matter to me (wikipedia itself is heavily politically biased, as one of the founders says), what matters is why you are bothered by the following 2 sentences, which describe the reality, the content of large articles, that you have to repeatedly delete them with fabricated reasons. Isn't it embarrassing for you to fake reality like that?

My sentence, which has been repeatedly deleted: Children should not have been present at this performance at all.

Ministry Statement:

"The State Secretary of the Ministry of the Environment, Stefan Kuffa, pointed out the unsuitability of this performance for minors, which resulted in a physical assault on his person. We therefore want to condemn any violence at cultural events and stress the need for consistent and responsible behaviour by organisers at public events. If a performance is suitable for the 18+ age group, it is not acceptable for it to be freely available to children and minors. The Minister of Culture Martina Šimkovičová has also been pointing out this fact for a long time," Petra Bačinská, spokeswoman for the Ministry, said.

My sentence, which has been repeatedly deleted: The whole thing is being used as an artificial political attack by the opposition on a member of the governing coalition.