User talk:96.44.163.76

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


January 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Raisin, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Raisin was changed by 96.44.163.76 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.916329 on 2012-01-31T03:22:03+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:22, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Orange juice. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Orange juice was changed by 96.44.163.76 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.964722 on 2012-01-31T03:24:29+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:24, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Cranberry, you will be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Cranberry was changed by 96.44.163.76 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.91947 on 2012-01-31T03:25:37+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:25, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Apple juice, you will be blocked from editing without further notice.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Apple juice was changed by 96.44.163.76 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.993192 on 2012-01-31T03:28:55+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:28, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 03:34, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|reason=I wasn't doing anything wrong, I was providing my knowledge on the articles I edited for others to benefit from. This is part of my charity work and I don't understand why you've resorted to this. ~~~~}}

About your block[edit]

Hello. I'm assuming that you think that your contributions are useful and such. Well, they aren't. This isn't what people would want in an encyclopedia. How are people going to benefit from this? So, please, don't make edits like that again. Thank you. Thekillerpenguin (talk) 00:36, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]