User talk:98.122.60.249

May 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Matt Walsh (political commentator) ‎. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Meters (talk) 00:43, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Posting facts is unconstructrive? Did you look at the satellite images available online? 98.122.60.249 (talk) 18:39, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong reply, but I do NOT vandilise. I add detail that left-leaning individuals don't like. 98.122.60.249 (talk) 18:46, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at 2024 Enga landslide, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. . Borgenland (talk) 17:30, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is not vandilism, damn it. Due your damn job and add detail to this fictional post. Look at the satellite images. There were fewer than 5 homes in that area. I'm posting facts because I'm tired of falsehoods. 98.122.60.249 (talk) 18:39, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is based on reliable sources, not internet conspiracy theories from anonymous editors. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 18:41, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Look up the satellite images and get the facts yourself. I can't believe the lack of critical thought in 2024. 98.122.60.249 (talk) 18:44, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is not allowed in Wikipedia. It is considered original research. PhilKnight (talk) 18:52, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But articles can link to ridiculous sources and it becomes "verified"? It's ridiculous. How does wiki define "reliable source"? 98.122.60.249 (talk) 18:54, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See reliable source. PhilKnight (talk) 18:57, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're right. We should ignore all rescue organisations actually at the location, and listen instead to landslide experts on the internet who know how to use Google maps and have done 5 mins of extensive in-depth research. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 19:07, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Did you bother looking for yourself at the satellite images or are you simply dense? https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2024/05/27/landslide-papua-new-guinea-png-deaths/

Ask yourself. Where are the "rescue organisations" getting their data from?

Go to the article. Look up the images, then go to Google maps and look up the Sat photo. 98.122.60.249 (talk) 20:28, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Look up this fact alone from the article: The first paragraph under "Impact" states six villages were destroyed, and the reference is a Guardian article about the landslide. Go to that Guardian article. There is NOTHING in that article stating 6 villages were destroyed. Are you going to fact theck each "reference" or do I need to do it for you? 98.122.60.249 (talk) 20:39, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Daniel Case (talk) 21:55, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at 2024 Enga landslide, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article.

In addition, please do not edit war to repeatedly change content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:56, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.