User talk:A8UDI

Retired

This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.

Note of personal attack probably made by this editor[edit]

Note. Tan | 39 22:16, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tanthalas! When I trace the IP that made this comment, it is in a different city and state than A8UDI. If you suspect that they are one in the same, why not ask one of WP’s best checkusers to run CheckUser on the IP and this user to confirm your suspicions? With my albeit limited skillset, I come up with this editor being in New York (I won’t mention the city for privacy reasons), while the IP is in Worcester, Massachusetts. I hope I’m not wrong: I’d hate to think that this editor had stooped to making anonymous personal attacks. What are your thoughts on using CheckUser to confirm? Thanks! — Spike Toronto 17:51, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. I know that it’s unusual to post to a retired talk page, but I was unsure how else to respond to your post on a retired user’s talk page. Thanks for understanding! — Spike Toronto 18:01, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gone? Yet another editor retired... I'll miss patrolling with you. fetchcomms☛ 00:00, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

UPDATE A much smarter wikieditor than I suggested using Traceroute rather than Geolocate in this matter. Little did I know that Geolocate can yield incorrect results. It turns out, according to Traceroute, that the IP editor does indeed trace to that city in Western New York after all. My apologies to the wise Tan39. — Spike Toronto 05:54, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ten Dollar Dinners[edit]

The article Ten Dollar Dinners has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Sources are WP:PRIMARY, nothing better found

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:04, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ten Dollar Dinners for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ten Dollar Dinners is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ten Dollar Dinners until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:32, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]