User talk:AA999

Welcome![edit]

Hello, AA999, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

May 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Letter box may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:37, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Letter box[edit]

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Letter box. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you.

Your recent edits appear in contavention to a number of Wikipedia guidleslines and policies including:

3RR, ref.:[1]
COI, ref.:[2]
Means of promotion, ref.:[3]

Please do not make such unconstructive edits.

edits at Symon Petliura[edit]

Hi !

Since you have only a few edits yet, you may not be familiar with various Wikipedia policy, if that is the case please take a look Wikipedia:Citing sources. You are correct that in doubt all notable views should be included in the article, however this can not be achieved by replacing one view by another and most importantly it cannot be done in an unsourced fashion. In controversial political articles it is not acceptable to add unsourced material. So if you want to include the view point you've added, you need to provide a source. In case you have difficulties with proper format of a source/footnote you can ask for help on the article's talk page. On th talk page you may also state an unsourced view point so that other might consider it and help to provide proper sources for it. However to include in the article directly it needs to come with a proper source or other editors will remove it again.

regards,

--Kmhkmh (talk) 15:59, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As for you latest edit even historical facts need to be sourced and cannot simply be claimed by Wikipedia editors. But more importantly the bigger problem is not the bigger court ruling but its assessment and the claimed Jewish of him, that needs to be sourced as well.--Kmhkmh (talk) 16:03, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:IdealGuard™ multifunctional secure mail box.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:IdealGuard™ multifunctional secure mail box.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 02:05, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]