User talk:ABDB1
ABDB1, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi ABDB1! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 18 January 2019 (UTC) |
Nomination of Brajesh Tiwari for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brajesh Tiwari until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Alexandermcnabb (talk) 05:33, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
The author has written several well-researched articles in publication of repute which have been appreciated by policy makers and referenced by World Bank for their report on Indian economy. This page deserves to be kept alive. Prorahul (talk) 13:07, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Raaja Kanwar for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raaja Kanwar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
scope_creepTalk 10:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Brajesh Tiwari for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brajesh Tiwari (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
UtherSRG (talk) 16:42, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Dr NSAM Pre University College for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr NSAM Pre University College until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Newhaven lad (talk) 15:31, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Adebayo Adeleke for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adebayo Adeleke until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.scope_creepTalk 17:37, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
September 2024
[edit]
Hello ABDB1. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Adebayo Adeleke, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.
Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:ABDB1. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=ABDB1|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. scope_creepTalk 17:38, 9 September 2024 (UTC)