User talk:AJFU/Archive 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

January 2019

can you stop this user for editing this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Universal_Pictures_theatrical_animated_features? GarfieldFTW PeppaPigFTL (talk) 20:25, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

I've reverted the user's recent edits to that page and left a warning. If the user continues with such edits, the next step would probably be to report them here, and then an administrator will probably block the user from further editing.  AJFU  (talk) 21:05, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

What are you currently watching?

I kind of had a feeling you'd show up at Sydney to the Max. So what are you currently watching in terms of current scripted live-action? Here's my list.

  • * On hiatus between seasons
  • ** On hiatus

Nickelodeon:

Disney Channel:

ABC:

CBS:

NBC:

FOX:

Amaury (talk | contribs) 18:51, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Just Bizaardvark, Coop & Cami, and Sydney to the Max.  AJFU  (talk) 21:39, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

A page you started (Jack Nicklaus Golf & Course Design: Signature Edition) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Jack Nicklaus Golf & Course Design: Signature Edition.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Great work on these old video game titles!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Sam Sailor}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Sam Sailor 13:38, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

@Sam Sailor: Thanks for everything. Also, I don't really have an interest in WP:DYK, but thanks anyway.  AJFU  (talk) 23:34, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

Autopatrolled granted

Hi AJFU, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! — MusikAnimal talk 17:28, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

Toy Story 4

May you PLEASE undo the edit you recently did to that article? I just read your source for Rex and it incorrectly states that Michael Keaton will be in the film, something which has already been deconfirmed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 181.167.106.138 (talk) 15:20, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

The same source is also being used to support Jeff Garlin's role as Buttercup, so undoing the edit would not resolve this entirely. The source would still remain in the article. Do you have a different source – which is accurate and up-to-date – that could be used for these two characters?  AJFU  (talk) 16:43, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Rotten Tomatoes has Jeff Garlin but not Wallace Shawn so... it’s something I guess. https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/toy_story_4 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 181.167.106.138 (talk) 18:17, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Barnstar

The Video game Barnstar

Just discovered how much effort you've been putting into WikiProject Video games' coverage of golf games and—wow! Incredible work creating, writing and sourcing pages like Jack Nicklaus' Unlimited Golf & Course Design, Jack Nicklaus 6: Golden Bear Challenge, Microsoft Golf 2001 Edition, Links: The Challenge of Golf and more. Until now, golf games have been tragically overlooked by WPVG, and it's amazing to see this forgotten page of video game history incorporated into the project so thoroughly. Thank you for all your contributions! JimmyBlackwing (talk) 00:52, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

Thanks.  AJFU  (talk) 13:38, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
The Editor's Barnstar
For your creation of well written and referenced articles at Links LS 2000 and Microsoft Golf 2001 Edition. Kudos for such a great work. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 22:27, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
Thanks.  AJFU  (talk) 15:28, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Fiesta Henderson logo.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fiesta Henderson logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 02:41, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

Just Roll with It

Is this new series something you've been giving a try and watching? Like it? :) Amaury • 19:16, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

I saw an episode. I thought it was okay, but it didn't really interest me enough to give it a second chance.  AJFU  (talk) 19:49, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

Invitation

You're invited to the section of WP:FILM about the issues of the format of 2019 in film. BattleshipMan (talk) 14:37, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

Thank you, but I don't have much interest in this.  AJFU  (talk) 14:52, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

Gabby Duran & the Unsittables

Are you going to be watching this one, or at least be giving it a try like with Just Roll with It? Amaury • 23:07, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Maybe some day, but at the moment I don't plan to check it out.  AJFU  (talk) 17:42, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

hi for Terminator

you cant see more terminator films page have Model 101 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:4802:2800:0:0:0:0:357 (talk) 21:28, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Can you please clarify? What I am asking is why Model 101 needs to be in quotation marks, like this: "Model 101".  AJFU  (talk) 15:58, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Terminator (character concept), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dark Horse (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

Ocean Software games

Hi! If you are starting articles based on Ocean Software games, there is also Cobra (video game) and Short Circuit (video game). 2600:1700:E820:1BA0:4AF1:7FFF:FEE5:C031 (talk) 18:46, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

Hello. I wasn't intentionally seeking out Ocean Software games, although these look like they could have potential. I'll look into them eventually. Thanks.  AJFU  (talk) 15:40, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

Retro games

Hi there! :) I have been appreciating your work on creating new articles for retro video games (including some that I had started redirects for in case I wanted to start an article one day), and I was wondering if you take requests? Mostly what I was thinking of is that about a decade ago I had created a lot of little stubby articles based on reviews that I had found in Dragon magazine. Many of those were developed by people who were interested in the topics, but some of them... not so much. :) If you're curious what I mean, three of the ones I started with were OrbQuest: The Search For Seven Wards, Realms of Darkness, and Into the Eagle's Nest, each of which has received a moderate amount of development over the years. I'm not sure which types of game articles you like to work on the most, but I could take a look to see what you might be interested in? BOZ (talk) 03:24, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

Hello. I'm not really interested in taking requests. I don't have an interest in any particular types of games. Mostly, I'm just creating pages for games that don't already have one. There are about a handful of game articles that I'll probably be creating over the next month. After that, I'll probably take a break from game article creation.  AJFU  (talk) 14:31, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for replying, and happy editing, keep up the good work. :) BOZ (talk) 03:04, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

Bunk'd

I think the summary for "Cramped Champions" is okay, but you may wish to look it over and copy-edit it, if necessary. Rtkat added the summary for that one, and they have some bad habits when it comes to writing, like going way over the maximum 200 by adding a lot of unnecessary detail that doesn't aid us in understanding the overall plot of the episode or not making their sentences flow very well. Generally, they have a bad habit of doing a lot of sentence fragment-type stuff, which I can see some of on their "Cramped Champions" summary, like using periods instead of commas or semi-colons. They used to be a lot worse, but they still haven't shaken the bad habit in general. Amaury • 18:55, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Editor's Barnstar
For your contribution of episode summaries and other information to articles like List of K.C. Undercover episodes, List of Bizaardvark episodes, List of Lab Rats episodes, List of Kirby Buckets episodes, as well as your contributions of episode summaries to currently airing series List of Bunk'd episodes, List of Coop & Cami Ask the World episodes, and List of Sydney to the Max episodes. And anything I may have missed. Thank you for your hard work. Amaury • 21:58, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Thank you. Speaking of Sydney to the Max, I actually don't intend to keep watching it. I've found it to be rather boring.  AJFU  (talk) 14:43, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
Aw, that's a shame you no longer like it, but to each their own. Amaury • 15:22, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

Completing page moves

AJFU, earlier today you moved page Talk:Landmark Hotel & Casino to Talk:Landmark (hotel and casino) over redirect. Can you please do the same for Talk:Landmark Hotel & Casino/GA1, the ongoing Good Article review, moving it back to Talk:Landmark (hotel and casino)/GA1 (currently a redirect)? Right now, the GA review has been orphaned—the bot can't find it via a redirect—and the move would fix that. Unfortunately, I was unable to do the move when I tried, so you probably have a permission that I don't.

If you can't do the move yourself, as you did with the main article and article talk pages, let me know and I'll find an admin, but I figured if you could move those pages over redirects, you could do so with this one. Thank you very much! BlueMoonset (talk) 22:16, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Hello @BlueMoonset: I just tried moving the page, but I was unable to do so. The message reads, The requested page title is invalid. It may be empty, contain unsupported characters, or include a non-local or incorrectly linked interwiki prefix. I tried moving it to "Landmark (hotel and casino)/GA1", not "Talk:Landmark (hotel and casino)/GA1". Is "Talk" necessary to type into the "New title" box that is located on the right side? I assumed it would be covered by the drop-down box on the left that is already set to "Talk", but I wasn't sure.  AJFU  (talk) 13:45, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
AJFU, I think that was the problem: one or more of the spaces in "Landmark (hotel and casino)/GA1" were not valid spaces for whatever reason. I pasted in the string, deleted all the spaces and added in new ones, and it moved just fine. Thanks for trying, and for pointing out the error message. We're all set now. BlueMoonset (talk) 13:56, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Irina Spalko, Antonin Dovchenko, and other Russians from Indiana Jones

Which would you rather see them being in the movie or in a story? Government officials or mobsters? Give me your reason for your answer, please. (64.20.139.52 (talk) 01:17, 1 August 2020 (UTC)64.20.139.52)

This isn't a fan forum, and please don't restore false information to the article again.  AJFU  (talk) 13:50, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Greetings

Nice to meet you ~
~ Thanks for your help in the article Virgin Hotels Las Vegas ~ ~mitch~ (talk) 13:29, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:46, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Jurassic World: Dominion

Hello! This film really isn't mentioned in the source but all other Jurassic Park/World films are, so obviously it is a giant monster film too.--Дейноніх (talk) 20:05, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Hello. We can't make assumptions. It has to be mentioned in the source. Some of your other edits have been undone out of concern that the Microsoft Store is not an adequate source. Also, I have never heard of these films being referred to as "giant monster movies" or "Kaiju", and I couldn't find any sources supporting these labels. We should stick to whatever description is most commonly used.  AJFU  (talk) 16:08, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Video game covers and screenshots

When uploading images pertaining to video games, can you please place them in their platform-specific categories? N. Harmonik (talk) 22:57, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Will do.  AJFU  (talk) 13:58, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Hae Un Lee

On 30 August 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Hae Un Lee, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. SpencerT•C 03:33, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

Momee Gombe

Hi, please help to patrol this article Momee Gombe.

Thanks -Gwanki (talk) 00:08, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

Hello. I'm not sure if I understand what you're asking for. Are you looking for a page reviewer?  AJFU  (talk) 14:44, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

Redirects

Hello, do you know where's the best place to ask about deleting redirects and such please? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7F:38FC:A300:B8A6:A3B0:D0D3:3DC0 (talk) 00:51, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Perhaps these links will help: WP:R#CRD and WP:RFD.  AJFU  (talk) 14:16, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Thank you. 14:45, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Buffalo's Cafe.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Buffalo's Cafe.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:07, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

The Prologue - Jurassic World Dominion

It's called so on YT. And when it premiered on TV. So it's its official title. People can refer to Jurassic World Dominion just Dominion it doesn't make it its official title. I can refer to Aquaman (2018), Man from Water does it mean anything? Nope. Official title is official title. It's supposed to be an encyclopedia. 2A02:810B:40C0:8B4:7465:EC6C:48B:B8F7 (talk) 12:02, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia doesn't always go by official names. If an unofficial name is the common name, then we usually go with that. In this case, official sources differ on what the title actually is. The prologue was uploaded to Youtube with the title The Prologue - Jurassic World Dominion, but Jurassic World's Twitter page calls it The Prologue to Jurassic World Dominion. Neither title appears to be in common usage. As for the TV premiere, the few sources I've found only refer to it as Jurassic World Prologue ([1], [2]).
The actual footage itself doesn't feature an on-screen title. It appears that most secondary sources just refer to it as a "Jurassic World Dominion prologue", or some other variation like "the prologue for Jurassic World Dominion" or "the prologue to Jurassic World Dominion" (all with "prologue" in lowercase, indicating that it's not a proper name). Therefore, "Jurassic World Dominion prologue" seems to be the best title. It's concise and most sources refer to it this way.  AJFU  (talk) 18:51, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Dinosaurs in Jurassic Park

Excuse me Mr or Mrs AJFU, but I have seen that you have been removing my edits to include Camp Cretaceous on the page Dinosaurs in Jurrasic Park. You have said the quote "Not clear what "Gaming Beaver" is or how it makes any of these animals noteworthy" even though The Gaming Beaver, and yes, it also includes The in the name, is a popular Jurrasic Park Youtuber with over 3 million subscribers which you should actually watch if you want dinosaur content. And the reason why this youtube makes these dinosaurs relevant is that people watch this series, however old they are. Another example would be star wars rebels, which is a kiddy show but people still watch this film and IGN (search up if you don't know) reviews this show because this is star wars. And Camp Cretaceous is from the Jurrasic movies, which makes it more important than you would think. Another quote that you said is "the show's impact on the lore has little (if any) relevance" even though it said dinosaurs have relevance to be the original Indoraptor, shows the Spinosaurus after 20 years and even longer for the Dilophosaurus, the Carnotaurus from Fallen Kingdom actually has a reason why it is burned and scared with many more important plot details. And even if you say this article doesn't go into plot details, it shows every dinosaur in canon, which should include Camp Cretaceous. So, if you mind not removing Camp Cretaceous from the page, that would be really good Thanks.


S.Z — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sevak Zeinali (talk • contribs) 23:33, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Anyone can make a Youtube account and start posting videos talking about whatever they want. I don't understand how that makes these animals noteworthy, just because someone talks about them in their videos. It just sounds like user-generated content. Is there any real-world information about these animals, like what went into their creation? That is the focus of the article.
The table of appearances is meant to supplement the "List of creatures" section. It's a quick way to see which animals appeared in which films, while the "List of creatures" goes into detail about those animals. In other words, readers should expect that any animal in the table would also be covered, in more detail, in the list section. Otherwise, all we're doing is listing a bunch of unsourced appearances in the table with no context as to why they're noteworthy. This does little to inform readers. It feels incomplete to only list the Camp Cretaceous animals in the table and then not mention them anywhere else in the whole article. Readers will likely be confused by this. With that said, I am not advocating that we add details about Camp Cretaceous to the individual dinosaur sections, as it would probably amount to nothing more than mere appearances and in-universe plot details.
I will reiterate some points that I made on the article's talk page:
  • The show itself is obviously notable, but the dinosaurs in it are not. Although the show is popular, there's apparently nothing of substance to say about its animals, other than the fact that they appear.
  • Dinosaurs in Jurassic Park is already a big page, and we haven't even gotten all of the details yet on the Dominion animals. The article is big enough already without also adding Camp Cretaceous. If real-world info about the Camp Cretaceous animals should ever come out, it would probably be best covered at the actual Camp Cretaceous article.
I don't know what you mean about the Indoraptor. If there's a reliable source about Spinosaurus returning, I might not be opposed to mentioning that in the Spinosaurus section. However, I disagree that we need to have an entire column of unsourced Camp Cretaceous animals in the table of appearances.
the Carnotaurus from Fallen Kingdom actually has a reason why it is burned and scared with many more important plot details. I didn't know it was burned and scarred (looked fine to me). How does that figure into the plot? It sounds trivial. If the other plot details you alluded to are like this, then that's not a strong case for including Camp Cretaceous.
it shows every dinosaur in canon, which should include Camp Cretaceous. Again, the page is not concerned with what's canon. We go by what's noteworthy, and that is determined by what's reported in reliable sources. The Camp Cretaceous dinosaurs are not mentioned because they are not covered in reliable sources.
If you disagree with my arguments, then please explain why.  AJFU  (talk) 17:24, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Hi
Now, I heard you what you said just then, and I somewhat agree with you, but still continue reading. Now, you mentioned:
Anyone can make a Youtube account and start posting videos talking about whatever they want.
Youtuber's can give really good points and can inspire movies. What I am saying is that they are more important then you think. I get that the focus of this article is about real-world information, then hybrids is not for this article. Although Camp Cretaceous does not really allow that many animals to be mentioned in the rest of the article, so does Battle at Big Rock. It doesn't show that many notable dinosaurs, like Camp Cretaceous, and it isn't a valid point if you say it's more important that Camp Cretaceous because Camp Cretaceous is animated, while Battle at Big Rock is live action. I wouldn't go too far seeing that the Oscars really became more controversial than it already was when they said animated movies are just for kids. And, I also don't get why the is still a Stegoceratops part, even if this is it's only appearance in all of the article, and how the Pachycephhlosaurus also appears in Jurassic World. I believe there are more of these weird and false features in your article that you would find if you take your time to extensively read you article. You also said
I don't know what you mean about Indoraptor.
Personally, I believe that you should research these kinds of things on Youtube before you come to me for answers. Anyways, the Scorpios Rex is actually the original version of the Indoraptor, so that's something interesting, like the Carnotaurus thing, which is an interesting detail.
So, what I am suggesting is that you do these things or allow me to do it myself via the talk page
- Remove the paragraph related to the Stegoceratops and move it to the Other Creatures Section.
- Move Camp Cretaceous animals to the Other Creatures Section.
- Make the Other Creatures Section feel more important than the end of the article, making it look squished and just nothing.
- Add Spinosaurus details related to Camp Cretaceous into the Spinosaurus paragraph.
- Possibly add interesting details related to Toro the Carnotaurus in the Carnotaurus paragraph.
- Add Interesting facts related to the Scorpios Rex in the Indoraptor paragraph.
- Possibly add facts related to Bumpy the Ankylosaurus in the Ankylosaurus paragraph.
- Reread your article to find more false things inside the article and correct them.
All of my suggestions that say possibly I am more alright with you not adding in the article than the others.
Thank you for reading this, get back to me if you disagree or agree with what I said and suggested, and Goodbye. Sevak Zeinali (talk) 09:39, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
I'm a bit busy, so it may be a few days before I have time to fully read through your suggestions and respond back.  AJFU  (talk) 14:40, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
@Sevak Zeinali: Youtube is usually not considered a reliable source. Please see WP:RSPYT.
I get that the focus of this article is about real-world information, then hybrids is not for this article. I don't know if I'm reading this right. Are you asking why fictional dinosaurs are included in an article written from a real-world perspective?
I agree about Battle at Big Rock. There's not much info available about the animals that appear in it, and the short film's article already covers all there is to say about those particular creatures. The other short film is just a prologue of deleted footage from Jurassic World Dominion. Nearly all the animals that appear in the prologue are also in the main film, so why don't we just cut out the short films? For the table of appearances, we can use a note for the prologue-only appearances. The new chart would look like this:
New chart
Taxa Jurassic Park trilogy Jurassic World trilogy
Jurassic Park The Lost World:
Jurassic Park 		Jurassic Park III Jurassic World Jurassic World:
Fallen Kingdom 		Jurassic World
Dominion
1993 1997 2001 2015 2018 2022
Allosaurus Appearance
Ankylosaurus Appearance
Apatosaurus Appearance
Atrociraptor Appearance
Baryonyx Appearance
Brachiosaurus Appearance Appearance Appearance
Carnotaurus Appearance
Ceratosaurus Appearance
Compsognathus Appearance Appearance
Corythosaurus Appearance
Dilophosaurus Appearance Appearance
Dimetrodon Appearance
Dimorphodon Appearance Appearance
Dreadnoughtus Appearance
Gallimimus Appearance Appearance
Giganotosaurus Appearance
Iguanodon Appearance[a]
Indominus rex Appearance
Indoraptor Appearance
Lystrosaurus Appearance
Mamenchisaurus Appearance
Microceratus Appearance
Moros Appearance
Mosasaurus Appearance
Nasutoceratops Appearance
Oviraptor Appearance[a]
Pachycephalosaurus Appearance Appearance
Parasaurolophus Appearance
Pteranodon Appearance
Pyroraptor Appearance
Quetzalcoatlus Appearance
Sinoceratops Appearance
Spinosaurus Appearance
Stegosaurus Appearance
Stygimoloch Appearance
Therizinosaurus Appearance
Triceratops Appearance
Tyrannosaurus Appearance
Velociraptor Appearance

Notes

  1. ^ a b This animal appears in the film's 2021 prologue.
Can you clarify what you mean about Pachycephalosaurus and "weird and false features"? As for the Carnotaurus, I fail to see how it being scarred is something worth mentioning. It may be interesting to a fan, but this isn't a fan site. If reliable sources don't talk about something, then neither does Wikipedia. Has this been covered in any secondary sources?
Page size should be taken into consideration. The page is already quite large, and restricting the scope of the article to the film series seems like a logical cutoff point, considering that it's the primary focus in sources. With that said, I remain open to the possibility of mentioning Camp Cretaceous in the Spinosaurus section, but first we need reliable sources (something other than Youtube). The same goes for Ankylosaurus, the Indoraptor / Scorpios rex connection, and any other Camp Cretaceous animals. Also note that just because a detail can be supported by a reliable source, that doesn't guarantee its inclusion in an article (see WP:VNOT).
The "Other creatures" section is for animals that have received minimal coverage in reliable sources, with not enough info to justify a separate section. I think there is potential to expand the "Other creatures" section. There's the "Making of" books for Jurassic Park and The Lost World. There's bonus features on the numerous home video releases from over the years. I believe Cinefex did at least a couple articles about the films, which may be useful. There's also this book for the original trilogy, and this upcoming one for the new trilogy.
The Stegoceratops section is a couple paragraphs long, so it wouldn't make sense to move that into "Other creatures". Are you asking why Stegoceratops isn't in the table of appearances? For simplicity, that chart only lists living animals.  AJFU  (talk) 17:05, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
Now, AJFU. I know that there has been tension regarding the Dominion stuff, but I won't be focusing on Dominion. Now, the Pachy thing was that the chart that is at the top includes the Pachy falsely as a dinosaur in the movie Jurassic World. That it what I mean by "false features" that you should try to find. The Spinosaurus thing is good and I want the Spino part to include its information in Camp Cretaceous. Now, for the Other Creatures Section, I have an idea which would feel weird, but would expand it greatly. The creation of another Wikipedia article which is related to the non-notable dinosaurs in Jurassic Park called Minor Dinosaurs in Jurassic Park. This document could include the likes of Camp Cretaceous dinosaurs, Battle at Big Rock dinosaurs, Dominion prologue dinosaurs, cancelled dinosaurs and so much more and will allow to flesh out some other dinosaurs that appear in these Jurassic things. And, it would also allow you to remove a chunk from the original article, which shortens the page. And it can be done as shown in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_DreamWorks_Animation_productions, which puts links for dreamworks TV shows and unproduced movies and condenses the original article.
Now, I propose those ideas for your article and would like a reply back. Sevak Zeinali (talk) 11:25, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
@Sevak Zeinali: It is not my article. Nobody owns an article. Pachy does appear and is mentioned by name. For Spinosaurus, I tracked down some sources myself and added some stuff in.
As for your suggestion of a new article, Wikipedia does not create pages for non-notable subjects. The Camp Cretaceous dinosaurs don't appear to be notable (Spinosaurus being an exception). The Battle at Big Rock dinosaurs are not notable. The only notable cancelled dinosaur that I can think of is Stegoceratops. There's not a lot of info that relates specifically to the prologue dinosaurs, and I assume the same is true for dinosaurs in other media. In other words, there is no need to create a second article. It would probably be deleted.  AJFU  (talk) 20:17, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
Now, I also want to talk about the Ouranosaurus thing. Ouranosaurus in briefly shown in Jurassic World Dominion in the shadows. I can't show you this scene mainly because the movie hasn't released on DVD's or on streaming services, but it is in the film. If you want to go against it, prove your reasons on the talk page. Sevak Zeinali (talk) 11:27, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
I assume you mean this talk page. Of all the sources I've come across, not one of them has ever mentioned an Ouranosaurus. You say that it's only briefly visible "in the shadows", which makes me question how easy it is to see. The lack of sources has me wondering whether it really is an Ouranosaurus. Anyway, contested edits require sourcing. Otherwise, it's probably original research, which is not allowed on Wikipedia. Out of curiosity, when and where exactly does this animal appear?  AJFU  (talk) 20:17, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
Hi AJFU. Now, it has been a while since we have talked, and I feel like a lot can change in 2 months. I have just seen how Camp Cretaceous has again tried to be added with your decline, but a lot has changed and I feel like we should have Camp Cretaceous in the list of features. Why, you might be asking, that my opinion has changed after the last season. First of all, there was an introduction to the Nothosaurus, which is not only an interesting prehistoric creature that is the 2nd aquatic prehistoric creature in Jurassic Park (tell me if I'm wrong). This also shows us that the Spinosaurus is still alive in the Mantah Corp island and also proves even more that Beta and Blue aren't the last Velociraptors. But, this is what I said about the other dinosaurs that were added before this season. My main point is what this is doing the Jurassic Series itself. So far, there is no other movie announced and is coming out for the Jurassic Series, so that leaves Camp Cretaceous and its possible (which is more likely now) sequel show. And even if there still could be the Lego series of shows, it is more like a ripoff to the Series than a real show. This leaves Camp Cretaceous (with its possible sequel show) the one thing, the only thing that currently is carrying this series which has gotten over a billion dollars with 3 films. This is why Camp Cretaceous dinosaurs should be mentioned in the graph for the prehistoric creatures in Jurassic Park, because it currently is the only way to update this article so this article can always remembered to be improved. Sevak Zeinali (talk) 03:58, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
There is not a single reliable source that discusses Nothosaurus, so that's out. The Spinosaurus stuff is already mentioned. The thing about surviving raptors doesn't seem important in an article that is focused on production information.
I'm not sure I understand your main point. Future films have not been ruled out. On the other hand, a Camp Cretaceous sequel show has not been mentioned in reliable sources or acknowledged by the showrunners, as far as I know. In any event, the franchise lives on through video games, theme park rides, and toys. The Jurassic World exhibition also continues to tour. Even if a Camp Cretaceous sequel show were the last ongoing part of this franchise, why would that mandate the inclusion of its predecessor's dinosaurs?  AJFU  (talk) 15:14, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Would you think about it, mainly because a sequel would be connected and the quote the more the better would come into play. This is short by the way because the device I am using to white this is low on battery without the close access to a charger. I would just ask you to think about it. Sevak Zeinali (talk) 01:33, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
A connection between Camp Cretaceous and an unannounced sequel show would not suddenly make these animals noteworthy. I'm thinking of another quote: "quality over quantity". In other words, "more" does not necessarily equal "better". Like I've said, the Camp Cretaceous animals would be included if there were actually something worth writing about them, beyond just plot details and trivia. If you cannot provide any reliable sources for these animals, then I think there's really nothing more to discuss here, unless you have something else to add.  AJFU  (talk) 16:07, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

Your Expansion of Las Vegas Strip Resorts Articles

AJFU, so far I've seen you expand the articles for the first ten resorts on the Las Vegas Strip with the exception of the Flamingo, the Riviera, and the Dunes. That is such a good task to accomplish because such expansions give readers a better idea of how they expanded over their existence, and other things we didn't previously know about those properties. For example:

  • The New Frontier's 65 years of operation weren't continuous, as it was closed for two years in the mid-1960s for a complete rebuild.
  • The second El Rancho's Tower was only open for a third of its 12-year lifespan.
  • "Silverbird" was two words?!

And on those exceptions, I am curious as to how the Flamingo evolved from motel to towers in the 1970s/80s, and only 850 of the Dunes's 1,300 rooms (an inflated number?) were accounted for in its original portion and towers. Jim856796 (talk) 01:57, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

"Silver Bird" was an early name. Looking into this a bit more, it seems that they switched to the one-word variation a year later (based on this). I'll probably do some more research into this (and the El Rancho's history) later.
I'm not really familiar with the Flamingo or Dunes. I might work on the Dunes article later this year. The Flamingo and Riviera don't really interest me, so they're sort of at the bottom of my to-do list. I have sources for many resorts (including Flamingo and Riviera) at my sandbox. If you or anyone else is interested, feel free to add those sources into their respective articles.  AJFU  (talk) 15:38, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Also, have you ever considered becoming a member of WikiProject Las Vegas because of all those Strip-hotel article expansions? Jim856796 (talk) 23:17, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
No. It looks like that group isn't active. I do have it on my watchlist, but I don't know what additional benefit there would be by adding myself to the list of participants.  AJFU  (talk) 15:16, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
And what about the issue of replacing references to the original namesake of Las Vegas's International Airport (Patrick McCarran) with the current namesake of the same airport (Harry Reid) regarding events at the airport prior to its December 2021 renaming? IndustryPlantCooper did it last year (with the simple motive of Pat McCarran being anti-Semitic and anti-Black), but I changed the references back to McCarran some time later, because I think his edits may go against Wikipedia's NPoV policy. Will this issue be enough to revive WikiProject Las Vegas? Jim856796 (talk) 21:16, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
We should use whatever name the airport was using at the time, for accuracy and the sake of verifiability (if an older source uses "McCarran", it wouldn't make sense for us to use "Harry Reid"). Perhaps WP:NOTCENSORED would also be applicable. Anyway, I don't think this would be enough to create interest in reviving the project (doesn't seem like it's been a major problem). I did find this and this about reviving projects, which you might find interesting.  AJFU  (talk) 15:34, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

Plot wise for List of Jurassic Park characters

I think some plot to the characters in the Jurassic World trilogy should be brought. Trimming it down to that size doesn't really improve the flow of it much. BattleshipMan (talk) 20:36, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

Exactly which character sections are you referring to? Are there specific suggestions that you had in mind?  AJFU  (talk) 15:01, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
In some parts of Owen, Claire, Maisie and others that are on Dominion doesn't have the flow of how they knew some things like how they discover Maisie's whereabouts from Malta to BioSyn HQ in Italy, among other things. Removing such things doesn't help the flow of the biography of characters. BattleshipMan (talk) 15:34, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
The focus should be more on the characters and less on the overall plot, which is handled in greater detail at the film articles. How Owen and Claire learn about Maisie's whereabouts doesn't really seem important to me. The point is that they eventually find Maisie in Italy. To go into further detail might require mentioning Franklin, Barry, Kayla, Soyona, and Rainn. However, their character sections already explain their relation to the kidnapping storyline. I don't really see the need to repeat this information in two or three other sections.  AJFU  (talk) 16:47, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
That's doesn't help with the flow of the character's actions. You want to create confusion without some of this information? BattleshipMan (talk) 16:56, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
I guess we could write something along the lines of Owen and Claire track them to Biosyn's headquarters in Italy, with help from Franklin, Barry, and Kayla. Would that help?  AJFU  (talk) 17:24, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Maybe. Not 100% sure how much it will help the flow of it, but it should be start I suppose until we can figure things out. I added about this issue to the talk page of that article in the "Proposed Trimming" section. BattleshipMan (talk) 18:13, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Mario Party

I just wanted to say thanks for your edits. I just got on to check specifically if Mario Party was ever released on any other console and I would have been mislead if it wasn't for your edit 10 hours earlier =] 

Just thought that was super cool and lucky timing on my end. Thank you again! 2600:1007:B11D:522F:CD07:E309:50D0:50D7 (talk) 04:04, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Writer's Barnstar
Fantastic work on the Vegas hotels! I got The Sands, Desert Inn and Caesar's Palace up to GA status. You have access to more resources than me! Would you be interested in working with me to get hotels like El Rancho and Mirage up to GA status? Looks like they're already GA standard or close! Flamingo Las Vegas another one worth doing though for some reason you don't seem interested in that! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:10, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
Would you be interested in working with me to get hotels like El Rancho and Mirage up to GA status? Sure. As for Flamingo, I'm sure there is a lot of history there. It'd probably be a big project, so I'm not really interested in taking that on.  AJFU  (talk) 15:06, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

Two draft articles for you to check

There's a couple of draft articles about two Jurassic World characters, Owen Grady and Claire Dearing, that I've been working on and will need some improvement.

Draft:Owen Grady

Draft:Claire Dearing

I managed to get some sources regarding those characters, but there updates and improvements that are needed, like the reception sections on those characters and to ensure it should be in neutral point of view. What do you think? BattleshipMan (talk) 04:41, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

They look decent so far. I can probably finish those up next week.  AJFU  (talk) 15:06, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
See to that if you do. BattleshipMan (talk) 23:00, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The setup of Claire Dearing article looks good. Owen Grady article will need expansion, as you probably know. BattleshipMan (talk) 02:01, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
I'm think I'm done now with both drafts, unless you have any other comments on how to improve them. If not, then they're probably good enough to be published.  AJFU  (talk) 02:39, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
The only thing we need is an image of them at their respective infoboxes. Other than that, it's good enough to be published. BattleshipMan (talk) 02:58, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

NeoBatfreak

I have to say this. NeoBatfreak has been making some questionable edits, including constantly changing the style of the plot of Jurassic World Dominion and has changed infobox images of Owen Grady and Claire Dearing. The image of Claire Dearing has dark shadows below it for one. I think you should check it out. Can you do that? BattleshipMan (talk) 19:56, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

I see you've now fixed the Claire image. I think the previous Owen image looked better as well, so if we're in agreement on that, I think the old image should be restored there too.
@NeoBatfreak: It does get repetitive having to keep up with the frequent changes at Jurassic World Dominion, as well as List of Jurassic Park characters and other pages. I suggest taking a long look at these articles to see what (if anything) needs to be changed (as previously suggested here), and then making those changes in a single edit (or fewer edits at least).  AJFU  (talk) 15:42, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
I just restored the original image of Owen Grady. BattleshipMan (talk) 19:24, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

A draft article to look at

A user name name Bmona12 has created a draft article of Maisie Lockwood. I'm a bit concerned that the user may have copied material from other sites since I saw one of Blue being deleted because of it. Check it out. BattleshipMan (talk) 14:59, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

Looks like much of it was actually copied from List of Jurassic Park characters (I don't know about other sites). I recently gathered some sources, but I haven't really looked through them yet, so I'm not sure that there would be enough page content to justify an article. If you're interested, you can feel free to look through them and let me know what you think:
Sources
For the raptor, I think it would make more sense to have a Velociraptor (Jurassic Park) page that covers all of the raptors rather than just Blue, as there is plenty of information that could be used to form a complete article about them.  AJFU  (talk) 16:01, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
What about that draft of Maisie Lockwood? Do you think you should expand her storyline in each movies or something like that? BattleshipMan (talk) 04:06, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
The fictional background looks fine. I'll look through the sources above and see what I can do for the rest of the page.  AJFU  (talk) 16:34, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
I've expanded the draft, and it was already submitted for review, so I guess now we'll just wait and see. If it's accepted, then I think Isabella Sermon should be redirected to the Maisie article, as the character seems to be more notable than the actress.  AJFU  (talk) 15:32, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

The Terminator (DOS) release date

According tho these two sources [3], [4] this game was releaed in 1990 not July 1991(mentioned in the LA Times source [5]).

Which source(s) should we use here? I ask because you added the LA Times source Timur9008 (talk) 09:50, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

The Bethesda website also lists The Terminator at the end of the 1990-91 heading, and the box art says the game was copyrighted "1990-91". The 1990 heading looks like an error, and the GamePro article seems to have gotten their info from the website. There aren't any reviews from prior to 1991, so that seems to be the correct date.  AJFU  (talk) 13:29, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for the reply! That makes sense. I guess the 1990 heading could have been for the fact that they acquired the Terminator license that year.(but forgot to updated that on the website)
Not related but can you add the RoboCop Versus The Terminator bit from Bethesda's website to that article? I'm not sure what "sub-licensed RoboCop Versus The Terminator to Virgin for console games" means. Timur9008 (talk) 13:41, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
From what I can tell, Bethesda got the license from Hemdale in 1990 to make Terminator computer games, and then Bethesda granted that license to Virgin, which released RoboCop Versus The Terminator on home consoles. Other than that, it appears that Bethesda had nothing to do with the RoboCop game, and I'm not sure that the licensing info is worth mentioning.  AJFU  (talk) 16:52, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AJFU/Archive_2&oldid=1158031062"