User talk:AKerr96

This is pretty clearly the same user as CulverPR

All the warnings that you were given at User talk:CulverPR still apply to this account.

You still have not responded or taken action to the inquiry regarding your appearance as an undisclosed paid editor. If you make any additional edits without complying you may be blocked from editing.

If you take any other action besides disclosing your employer, this account and any future accounts you try to create will be blocked from editing -- you as a person are the subject of the block.

Additionally, you need to stop editing The Drever article entirely, because you have a conflict of interest, as was previously explained to you. You can make edit requests on the article's talk page. You are also welcome to edit unrelated topics instead, with no more restrictions than any other editor.

Your continued actions thus far are a violation of our terms of service. We have every right to remove your presence from the site if you do not wish to comply with our terms of service, or policies and guidelines. Ian.thomson (talk) 20:40, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

To be clear, I could block you now and no admin would have an issue with it. Another admin might well block you if you wait to disclose your employer and or fail to promise here to stop editing the article. If you do any other action, any actions you take will be treated like vandalism from a troll.

This is your last chance. Not this account's last chance, but CulverPR's and The Drever's last chance. If this account is blocked, any new account that seems to belong to CulverPR will be blocked with the same level of prejudice as a spammer or troll, with edits undone as if they were petty vandalism. Ian.thomson (talk) 20:44, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not being paid to make edits

I am not being paid to make any edits to “The Drever”.. all I was doing was giving the accurate information on the building, so instead of it being partially correct it’s fully correct.. giving Wikipedia more credibility for accurate information. I’m aware that Wikipedia’s rules are corporate or groups are not allowed to make changes and that a name can not represent a group or organization.. I provided a link with my edits because that’s where the information is about the building, so I was matching up the two. Sorry if this violates your terms of use, I just don’t understand how giving the correct info on a page is a step away from me getting blocked. Again I realize because it seems like someone is paying me to do so and like I said i’m not. I guess tips on how to make changes without it seeming it’s a paid thing would be helpful to know, so I don’t get blocked. AKerr96 (talk) 21:33, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your account was registered less than 24 hours after CulverPR was blocked. It then carried out the sort of edits that CulverPR would have carried out.

I have found your employee profile for Culver Public Relations.

I'm blocking this account because you're clearly not interested in being upfront.

Congrats, your company will no longer be able to help your clients with the article. All accounts that might be sockpuppets for CulverPR will be blocked on sight and their edits reverted. Ian.thomson (talk) 22:22, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]