User talk:AaishaAfzaal

Welcome![edit]

Hello, AaishaAfzaal, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Noah Nnaemeka Abba, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:35, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thats great. Even the draft of an article are not safe here. Thats amazing! Those articles were in the draft form, niether completed nor published. AaishaAfzaal (talk) 23:15, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Noah Nnaemeka Abba[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Noah Nnaemeka Abba, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:35, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024[edit]

Hello AaishaAfzaal. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Noah Nnaemeka Abba, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:AaishaAfzaal. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=AaishaAfzaal|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:35, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thank you contacting and guiding me. As I am new to this platform always desired to edit the article with insufficient or incorrect information. I recently joined and started contributing voluntarily which I aim to continue. AaishaAfzaal (talk) 23:02, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eric Nofsinger (March 11)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GSS was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Eric Nofsinger and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GSS ^💬 05:17, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Modon1021 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Modon1021. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. The Wordsmith^{Talk to me} 00:26, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I do not think, there is a point to blocked indefinitely from editing and creating new pages. I have made significant edits which no one challenged over the originality, accuracy, and authenticity.

However I tried to create pages for rising stars (less known people), just a draft for Noah Nnaemeka Abba which I aim to continually develop until reach significant recognition and then publish, but even the draft was deleted. Furthermore, in case of Eric Nofsinger who has considerable coverage from various sources was also declined. AaishaAfzaal (talk) 01:58, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AaishaAfzaal (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am writing to appeal my indefinite block from editing, which was imposed due to allegations of abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Modon1021. I respectfully disagree with this characterization and believe that there has been a misunderstanding of my actions.

Throughout my time on Wikipedia, I have made significant contributions to various articles, ensuring originality, accuracy, and authenticity. These contributions have not been challenged by the community, highlighting the quality of my work and adherence to Wikipedia's guidelines.

I would like to address the specific instances mentioned in the block notice. Firstly, regarding my attempts to create pages for rising stars such as Noah Nnaemeka Abba, I would like to clarify that these were drafts aimed at continual development until they reached a level of significant recognition worthy of publication. Unfortunately, these drafts were deleted before they could be fully realized.

Similarly, I attempted to create a page for Eric Nofsinger, a notable individual with considerable coverage from reputable sources. Despite the verifiable information provided, the page creation was declined.

Moving forward, I am committed to abiding by Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. I understand the importance of transparency, notability, and verifiability in all contributions made to the platform. My intention is to contribute positively to the community by filling gaps in information, especially in areas of my expertise and interest where notable information may be lacking.

I respectfully request that my block be reconsidered, and I assure you of my dedication to upholding Wikipedia's standards in all future edits and contributions. Thank you for taking the time to review my appeal.AaishaAfzaal (talk) 02:16, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

AI/bot generated requests are not accepted(GPTzero ranked this 97% likely AI generated). It's not a bot that is blocked, you are blocked, so we want to hear from you. Please write a request in your own words. 331dot (talk) 07:42, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AaishaAfzaal (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I wanted to contribute to Wikipedia, blocking indefinitely is really disappointing. I have made significant edits, but I think made a mistake in creating the page about Noah Nnaemeka Abba. However, I wrote about Eric Nofsinger who had a reasonable coverage in online sources, but I do not have any association with the User:Modon1021. I do not have any other account and am independently writing and editing on Wikipedia which I wish to continue. It is needed to revise the decision and allowing me to be the part of Wikipedia community. Thank you.

Decline reason:

Checkuser data is Inconclusive in this case. AaishaAfzaal, you need to directly address the findings at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Modon1021. You haven't even mentioned the suspicion of WP:UPE. Nor does WP:MEAT require that you have more than one account. There's clearly a relationship of some sort between both accounts, as outlined in the sockpuppet investigation. Yamla (talk) 11:37, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.