User talk:AaronMychael

Welcome![edit]

Hello, AaronMychael, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 19:00, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lisa Rojany has been accepted[edit]

Lisa Rojany, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Tagishsimon (talk) 00:23, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nicholas O'Connell has been accepted[edit]

Nicholas O'Connell, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Tagishsimon (talk) 00:30, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for declaring your conflict of interest. That doesn't mean you can write what you like, you must follow the guidance below:

you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that the subject meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the person or an associated organisation or company, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, LinkedIn, other social media and other sites that can be self-edited, logs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what she claims or interviewing her. Review sites like Goodreads and sales sites like Amazon are also not acceptable, and your use should have been picked up by the AFC reviewers, especially as some of us use a script that shades such dubious sources in pink
You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews.

Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:23, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Tagishsimon:, you may wish to read what I've posted above. The script to which I refer is User:Headbomb/unreliable which simply makes sourcing problems more obvious Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:27, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much Jimfbleak for your guidance. Looking back at this, and few other articles I have written, I realize there are a few corrections that need to be made. I have a question, though ... I included many sources, and I now recognize some may be dubious as you claimed, but I've also used several good, solid sources (which is why, I believe, the article was accepted) - so my question is this: should I only include such sources - deemed dubious - in the EXTERNAL LINKS section? Many of those sources still add to the content of the article. Thanks again! Much appreciated. AaronMychael (talk) 21:26, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I won't be alerted to messages here unless you start them with {{u|Jimfbleak}} and sign them with four tildes in the same edit. External links should normally only be her own website, not everything connected with her. If they are either not acceptable sources or aren't adding anything worthwhile to the article, they shouldn't be anywhere in the page. External links definitely shouddn't repeat sites used for references Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:50, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Avanti Centrae (April 5)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Avanti Centrae and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Avanti Centrae, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 08:39, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AaronMychael! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DGG ( talk ) 08:39, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Avanti Centrae (May 20)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MapleSoy was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Thanks for submitting this article. Additional independent, reliable sources (e.g., magazine and newspaper articles) are needed to demonstrate this subject's notability (see guidelines above). Further, some of the claims are not supported by the references provided.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Avanti Centrae and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Avanti Centrae, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MapleSoy (talk) 02:47, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Avanti Centrae (December 27)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Avanti Centrae and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Avanti Centrae, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary (talk) 10:41, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Avanti Centrae[edit]

Hello, AaronMychael. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Avanti Centrae, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:02, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Avanti Centrae[edit]

Hello, AaronMychael. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Avanti Centrae".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:06, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]