User talk:Ababaian
January 2023
[edit] Hello, I'm TheManInTheBlackHat. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Viroinformatics have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. TheManInTheBlackHat (Talk) 21:11, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
- Hi, I can add in the
{{connected contributor}}
tag to the edit to disclose. I am a scientist affiliated with the Serratus project, but the project is certainly an example of viroinformatics and has been peer-reviewed. See: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-04332-2 Ababaian (talk) 21:17, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Serratus (virology) for deletion
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5f/Ambox_warning_orange.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_orange.svg.png)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Serratus (virology) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
TheManInTheBlackHat (Talk) 21:13, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
- What is the basis for the objection raised? Ababaian (talk) 21:26, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
- Based on the source you provided, I can't see why it is notable. If you want to dicuss, please take a look at the active AFD discussion. TheManInTheBlackHat (Talk) 21:52, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
- Please see my response in the deletion discussion. The work is in the 99th percentile for notability of scientific publications. Ababaian (talk) 21:54, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for adding these sources, please add them to the article, because when I read the article there was only one linked source. TheManInTheBlackHat (Talk) 21:55, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
- Please see my response in the deletion discussion. The work is in the 99th percentile for notability of scientific publications. Ababaian (talk) 21:54, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
- Based on the source you provided, I can't see why it is notable. If you want to dicuss, please take a look at the active AFD discussion. TheManInTheBlackHat (Talk) 21:52, 13 January 2023 (UTC)