User talk:Abhi2002pathak

This is Abhi2002pathak's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Neeru Yadav (September 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Churnalism and publicity material do not establish notability per WP:GNG.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Neeru Yadav and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:20, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Abhi2002pathak! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:20, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Draft:Neeru Yadav, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Stop removing the old reviews and comments KylieTastic (talk) 19:41, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please check now I have removed every template from article. Is article now fine. Abhi2002pathak (talk) 03:17, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You were told not to remove any templates. Please stop doing that. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:22, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will not change any thing from now, I just have to keep patience to get it verified, Can you please tell is there any thing that I should add or remove from article. can you verify my article if you are allowed to do so? Abhi2002pathak (talk) 06:28, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You've been told multiple times to stop removing the AfC templates. If you don't, you're going to lose access to this article. Please disclose other accounts you've edited as. Star Mississippi 12:38, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Neeru Yadav (September 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

Cites no new sources since the previous decline, therefore still no evidence of notability. Also, still inherently promotional. If this is submitted again without addressing these issues, the draft may be rejected outright without the option to resubmit.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Neeru Yadav and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:30, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Neeru Yadav (September 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

See WP:BLP. Statements, starting with the date of birth, need to be sourced or removed. The entire early life section, for example, is unsourced.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Neeru Yadav and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 10:28, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Neeru Yadav (September 19)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Resubmitted without any improvement. From that, and the number of previous declines, I can only conclude that better sources are not available and that the subject is therefore not notable enough to warrant inclusion in the encyclopaedia. To avoid further reviewer effort being expended on this draft, I am now rejecting rather than merely declining this.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:40, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Star Mississippi 13:57, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]