User talk:AbioScientistGenesis

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of AbioScientistGenesis (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

Welcome![edit]

Hello, AbioScientistGenesis, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Johnuniq (talk) 03:26, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Abiogenesis[edit]

I noticed your edits at Abiogenesis. For your information, four tildes are used only as a signature on a talk page. For example, at the end of this comment I will type a space and then four tildes; that will be changed into my signature as will be seen with a "preview". Tildes do not go in an edit summary. A more important point is that building the encyclopedia relies on collaboration, so comments about a "blatant lie" are not helpful. Perhaps someone is mistaken, or perhaps it is certain that someone is mistaken. Nevertheless, we respond as if it were a mistake, and just fix the issue. Johnuniq (talk) 03:26, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! AbioScientistGenesis (talk) 03:29, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Old references and Abiogenesis Myth[edit]

Wikipedia should not accept false scientific hoaxes such as abiogenesis. I said nothing about creationism. Abiogenesis is not supported by any scientific literature. AbioScientistGenesis (talk) 20:06, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia does not accept outdated and cherry-picked references and prose supporting creationism for inclusion in its articles about scientific topics, including abiogenesis. Therefore, your additions and changes have been reverted. Mj12hoaxwriter (talk) 00:51, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

AbioScientistGenesis, you are invited to the Teahouse[edit]

Hi AbioScientistGenesis! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Osarius (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:17, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AbioScientistGenesis. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 19:49, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AbioScientistGenesis. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Rs chen 7754 06:36, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]