User talk:Aboindustry

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Aboindustry, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:24, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article you created, Intelligence of Things does not appear to cite any sources[edit]

Hi. The article you just created, Intelligence of Things doesn't cite any references. If you write a article on Wikipedia it must be based off on reliable sources, see WP:V. If you need help citing your sources see Wikipedia:Tutorial/Citing sources. Please add references to this article. Thanks in advance. TruthToBeSpoken (talk) 21:53, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse![edit]

Hello! Aboindustry, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! TruthToBeSpoken (talk) 21:53, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Intelligence of Things[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Intelligence of Things, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
It covers a topic on which we already have an article - Artificial intelligence. (See section A10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Artificial intelligence, or to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CatcherStorm ^talk 22:46, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020[edit]

Hello, Aboindustry. We welcome your contributions, but it appears as if your primary purpose on Wikipedia is to add citations to research published by a small group of researchers.

Scientific articles should mainly reference review articles to ensure that the information added is trusted by the scientific community.

Editing in this way is also a violation of the policy against using Wikipedia for promotion and is a form of conflict of interest in Wikipedia – please see WP:SELFCITE and WP:MEDCOI. The editing community considers excessive self-citing to be a form of spamming on Wikipedia (WP:REFSPAM) and the edits will be reviewed and the citations removed where it was not appropriate to add them.

Finally, please be aware that the editing community highly values expert contributors – please see WP:EXPERT. I do hope you will consider contributing more broadly. If you wish to contribute, please first consider citing review articles written by other researchers in your field and which are already highly cited in the literature. If you wish to cite your own research, please start a new thread on the article talk page and add {{requestedit}} to ask a volunteer to review whether or not the citation should be added.

MrOllie (talk) 23:44, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Aboindustry, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

MrOllie (talk) 20:07, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aboindustry (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Greetings! I am reaching out to you as it seems that my account (Aboindustry) has accidentally violated Wikipedia contribution procedures, which has resulted in being confirmed by a CheckUser as a sockpuppet of Jayleecincinnati and being blocked indefinitely. Furthermore, all the references of Jay Lee have been removed from a number of Wikipedia articles.

This account has been confirmed by a CheckUser as a sock puppet of Jayleecincinnati (talk · contribs · logs), and it has been blocked indefinitely.
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sock puppet for evidence. This policy subsection may also be helpful. ---- Account information: block log – current autoblocks – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

Firstly, I disclose that I am Qibo Yang who registered for Wikipedia using the email aboindustry@outlook.com, confirmed on 30 November 2017 at 21:18. I hope this can prove that I am not Jay Lee, and that this account is not a sock puppet of Jayleecincinnati. If more personal information is needed to confirm my identity, please let me know. Secondly, I sincerely apologize that I mistakenly asked my friends to help me edit the page after my initial attempt to update a few citations was refused. (For example, Shellsmen: xy47@nau.edu.) I neglected to consult the guidelines and therefore did this without realizing the error I was making in doing so, or that I was violating Wikipedia policy. I also did not realize that such an act would result in the removal of all citations regardless of their merit. This is especially worrisome because, for a number of the deleted citations, the content in question originates directly from those sources. I fear I have damaged the author’s reputation as well as my future ability to make legitimate contributions to Wikipedia through these actions. The content I have contributed and the work I have cited in the past is highly relevant to those articles, and in some cases is the basis of those concepts. I have now better acquainted myself with the policies and procedures for editing Wikipedia articles and realize my mistakes. I pledge that I will never again engage in conduct that might result in my being suspected as a sockpuppet. I do apologize for the inconvenience caused and ask that the citations removed be restored as it was not my intention to call their legitimacy into question by my actions. Your guidance and understanding in this matter are greatly appreciated. Please advise if there are further steps I can take to expedite a solution to this matter. Aboindustry (talk) 22:06, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You have been spamming on behalf of Jay Lee for years, and should have been blocked long ago. Whether you are personally Jay Lee is irrelevant. Equally irrelevant is whether your blatant attempt to hide what you were doing was implemented by using multiple accounts or whether (as you claim) it was done by organising a group to do it. JBW (talk) 00:34, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.