User talk:Aboluay

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Aboluay, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!  -- JLaTondre 00:25, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article about a village in Germany[edit]

Hey Aboluay, do you like to translate the article Twist, Germany into Arabic. That would great and would be greatful--95.88.99.149 (talk) 23:54, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

history of the alphabet[edit]

Hi Aboluay,

Yes, you have made some valuable contributions, but unfortunately they contained factual errors as well, and I didn't have the time to figure out how best to correct them. You got the names of the Phoenician letters wrong (or at least their English transcriptions were wrong), and the Phoenician alphabet was the source of neither the word "alphabet", which is from Greek, nor "abjad", which is from Arabic. I believe that the information you added already exists in the article, though perhaps not in the best location, and it certainly already exists in the alphabet and abjad articles. —sabt (talk) 19:39, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

History of Arabic Numbers[edit]

Hello Aboluay, I am from Brazil and I hope you can read our theory about Arabic numbers. Thank you for you kind attention.Roberto Lyra (talk) 21:13, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MU ** Conti on time[edit]

Hey... LU.. complete the article when you can... can you contact me ... ** —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.141.161.199 (talk) 14:38, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Khalil Eljamal for deletion[edit]

A discussion has begun about whether the article Khalil Eljamal, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khalil Eljamal until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Anotherclown (talk) 07:20, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks to you[edit]

For starting the article. I've learned a lot by looking up stuff on al-Jamal. Always enjoy it when that happens. Anyway, I'll try to do what I can tonight, but my wikitime is limited. Thanks again. Tiamuttalk 18:13, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Lebanese nationality law needs more reliable and up-to-date information. If you are interested you can contribute to it. Thanks in advance.

Radartoothth (talk) 23:40, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Lebanese passport needs more reliable and up-to-date information. If you are interested you can contribute to it. Thanks in advance.

Radartoothth (talk) 23:40, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

09:46, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

08:30, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

09:30, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

08:38, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Welcome to WIKISOO[edit]

Hello and welcome to the Writing Wikipedia Articles course (#WIKISOO)! We look forward to meeting you in the first class on 25 February (Americas)/26 Feb (Asia/Australia). By now you should have received an introductory email with some details about the course. If you can't find it, there's an archived copy of the email at this link.

To attend the live session, please check our course home page for instructions and the link. We recommend logging into Blackboard Collaborate (the live class software we use) before the day of class, to be sure it's working. (More tips on the home page.)

If taking the course in self-paced mode, please come say hello on the course talk page so we know who you are! Thanks for signing up, and we'll see you Tuesday! - Pete (talk) 06:11, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

10:17, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

09:30, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Second WIKISOO class starts soon![edit]

Hi! Just a quick reminder that the second WIKISOO class starts in about 3 hours. Even if you missed Week 1, please join us at this link for the live webinar - ideally about 15 minutes early to test your mic/speakers. If you haven’t finished up your Week 1 homework, there’s still time; post any questions on the class talk page! You can also watch a video of last week’s class on YouTube (earlier audio problems have been corrected). Feel free to contact me on my talk page with questions anytime! - WIKISOO co-instructor Sara FB (talk) 22:04, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi from a fellow classmate! —Litjade (talk) 01:26, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You have new message/s Hello. You have a new message at Litjade's talk page.

09:10, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

WIKISOO Week 3[edit]

Hi Aboluay, we look forward to seeing you in class in a few hours. We look forward to seeing you in class in a few hours. Here's the link to our Week 3 class page and to the live webinar.

PLEASE NOTE: If you're not in the USA, please double-check the class time. We have gone on Daylight Savings Time (also known as Summer Time) in the USA, so for some of you the class time will be an hour earlier. (If your country goes on Summer Time in the coming weeks, you will want to check again!)

This week we are going to start off with some basic review of all we've covered. So if you've been feeling behind or confused by all the details, we'll make sure we've got your questions answered before forging ahead! See you soon, -Pete (talk) 16:27, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

07:14, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Week 4 of Writing Wikipedia Articles: Final Projects Ahoy![edit]

Hey Aboluay - hope all is going well with you as we segue into Week 4 of WIKISOO! Just a reminder, in case you need it, that depending on your time zone, class time may have shifted - check out this link to make sure you know when to join us. Looking forward to chatting more with you this week about the Final Project - if you already know which article you're working on, you'll find instructions there for sharing this information easily with your classmates. Post any questions to the class Talk page, please! See you in class tomorrow! Sara FB (talk) 01:42, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

18:56, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

WIKISOO check-in[edit]

How's it going, Aboluay? Just touching base as we start the fifth (!) week of the WIKISOO course. We're excited to see students working on such a diverse range of articles! If you haven't already, log in, scroll down to the bottom of the main course page to list your chosen final project article next to your own name; brag a little about your work (or just ask questions!) on the course talk page; and join the live lecture tomorrow as we move towards completion of the course! This is when things get exciting. :) Looking forward to seeing you in class! - Sara FB (talk) 23:40, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

09:20, 31 March 2014 (UTC)


Week 6 of WIKISOO[edit]

Hi Aboluay! Just checking in as we head into the final week of the Writing Wikipedia Articles class. You can look through last week's ether pad notes, check out your homework assignments from Week 5, and watch last week's lecture on YouTube - all right here. Check out my note from last week (above) if you're still diving into your Final Project... or head over to the course talk page to see if anyone else is having the same issues you are! Looking forward to seeing you in the last live webinar of the session tomorrow. Big WikiLove. -Sara FB (talk) 23:20, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

08:00, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

07:18, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

08:34, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

07:22, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

07:29, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

06:00, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

07:18, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

08:29, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

08:07, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

07:39, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

07:13, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

07:20, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

06:53, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

07:07, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

07:48, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

07:42, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

08:08, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

07:37, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

August 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Arabic Wikipedia may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "<>"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • phenomenal progress by which in December 2005, the total number of articles reached 8,285.<ref>[https://ar.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D9%88%D9%8A%D9%83%D9%8A%D8%A8%D9%8A%D8%AF%D9%8A%D8%A7:%D8%A5%D8%AD%
  • B9%D8%B1%D8%A8%D9%8A%D8%A9 Wikipedia Statistics - Arabic Wikipedia. Accessed on 4 August 2014</ref>> By that time, there were fewer than 20 contributors and the recruitment of new users started.<ref

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:24, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

07:43, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Arabic Wikipedia and Rami Tarawneh[edit]

Hi! Thank you for making additions to Arabic Wikipedia. I took a look at this and I'm puzzled why Rami Tarawneh is omitted in the edit. Secondary sources and not primary sources are the bread and butter of Wikipedia and Wired states that Tarawneh is very influential in the Wikipedia's development.

WhisperToMe (talk) 17:31, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This sounds like something that really needs to be discussed on the talk page. WP:V stated that "Its content is determined by previously published information rather than the beliefs or experiences of its editors. Even if you're sure something is true, it must be verifiable before you can add it." - Are there any secondary sources that mentioned any claims about other people taking credit or "So-and-so is not really to credit, so-and-so is?" If those sources don't exist, you have to follow what Wired says. That is unless/until a journalist interviews the other side and they get an article written about them. WhisperToMe (talk) 03:13, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"publicly published correspondence between Wikimedia and ArabEyes, the history of the Arabic Wikipedia discussions, the Wikipedia logs, the users talk pages and many other neutral secondary sources" - I believe all three would be primary sources because they are made by people directly involved in the Wikipedia community. Have you considered sending Wired a letter to the editor? WhisperToMe (talk) 03:42, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry, I'm not a lawyer! I'll take a look at your suggestions and refer to relevant passages from the Wired article. WhisperToMe (talk) 05:17, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The suggestions and responses:

1. "The phrase "Contributors encouraged him to start an Arabic Wikipedia" is incorrect. The Arabic Wikipedia was started by the Wikimedia German User group by mandate of the Foundation and was not initiated by any Arab individual."
  • Text of the Wired article: "Angry at this misrepresentation, Tarawneh contacted one of the English Wikipedia contributors, who told him that Wikipedia is a collaborative work. He hadn’t realized that. “If I find something wrong, I should fix it,” Tarawneh says. “Then the Wikimedia people told me, why not start your own language version?” Thus began Arabic Wikipedia, at first just a group of about five contributors, all Jordanians studying abroad in Germany."
  • So what I will do is modify it to say that this specific group began contributing in 2003. The Arabic Wikipedia itself was established before then, but the question is when did the mass development of articles start? Unless/until there is more literature on that I'll rewrite and state that the group of Jordanians in Germany began at that time.
"The phrase that starts with "By 2005, there were fewer than 20 contributors" till the end of the paragraph should be incorporated into the sentence that starts with "However, in 2005..." this will give more meaning to the flow of the history."
  • That's a good suggestion!
3. "In the sentence, "Therefore Tarawnah and other..." I suggest to replace it to say "The volunteers worked on recruiting new users". Choosing one name over others is not fair for the others."
  • The reason why I only gave Tarawneh's name is because the article did not mention the names of the other PhD students working with him. Unless/until someone finds the names of the other four...

WhisperToMe (talk) 05:31, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The July 2003 opening comes from this article (See page 94), which was written about the Egyptian Arabic Wikipedia WhisperToMe (talk) 05:35, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the modifications you have suggested. Please go ahead and make them. Let me know if you need me to do anything.

I will be learning about the policies and contact Wired and discuss with you my findings and any alteration before I make any changes. Thank you for your open mindedness. Definitely, you are not a lawyer ;)... AboluayTalk2me 05:48, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks :) - For the sentence "Therefore Tarawnah and other..." I decided after re-reading the Wired article that it's best to just collectively say "The administrators and contributors" collectively with no person standing out WhisperToMe (talk) 05:50, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
works for me. AboluayTalk2me 05:59, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

07:16, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

09:21, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

07:48, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

09:33, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

08:34, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

09:04, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

09:44, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

06:10, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

08:53, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

13:47, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

05:20, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

17:28, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

15:00, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

18:28, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

19:31, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

17:11, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

16:43, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

16:52, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

16:51, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

16:47, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

18:12, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

16:08, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

16:31, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

16:26, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

17:57, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

16:28, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

16:41, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

15:18, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

15:14, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

15:09, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

15:18, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

15:41, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

16:40, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

15:29, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

15:10, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Support request with team editing experiment project[edit]

Dear tech ambassadors, instead of spamming the Village Pump of each Wikipedia about my tiny project proposal for researching team editing (see here: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IdeaLab/Research_team_editing), I have decided to leave to your own discretion if the matter is relevant enough to inform a wider audience already. I would appreciate if you could appraise if the Wikipedia community you are more familiar with could have interest in testing group editing "on their own grounds" and with their own guidance. In a nutshell: it consists in editing pages as a group instead of as an individual. This social experiment might involve redefining some aspects of the workflow we are all used to, with the hope of creating a more friendly and collaborative environment since editing under a group umbrella creates less social exposure than traditional "individual editing". I send you this message also as a proof that the Inspire Campaign is already gearing up. As said I would appreciate of *you* just a comment on the talk page/endorsement of my project noting your general perception about the idea. Nothing else. Your contribution helps to shape the future! (which I hope it will be very bright, with colors, and Wikipedia everywhere) Regards from User:Micru on meta.

15:06, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

15:34, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

15:18, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

16:12, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

15:30, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

15:21, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

15:04, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

15:23, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

15:56, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

15:13, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

15:06, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

03:05, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

15:05, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

15:51, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

14:57, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

16:17, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

13:02, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

21:36, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

17:29, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

16:17, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

18:29, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

15:15, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

18:32, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

16:28, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

16:02, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

18:04, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

16:43, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

17:18, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

19:39, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

20:26, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

16:16, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

17:52, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

17:42, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

18:29, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

16:59, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

17:55, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

16:39, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

21:02, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

18:58, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

16:16, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

18:22, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

20:12, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

20:24, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

18:37, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

16:04, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

19:43, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

22:13, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

20:44, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

20:40, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

21:02, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

20:09, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Translation from English to Arabic[edit]

Hello User talk:Aboluay. I would like to request you if it is possible to create a page in arabic based on an english article. Here is the url:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fabio_Mancini.

It is a very short article so will you be willing to do it? Irene000 (talk) 11:19, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

23:22, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

16:01, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

18:40, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

16:19, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

20:51, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

18:41, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

19:14, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

15:42, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

19:45, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

15:14, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

12:01, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

19:54, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

21:48, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

15:41, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

19:37, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

21:18, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

16:01, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

17:12, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

18:04, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

22:08, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

18:07, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

21:30, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

20:30, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

16:42, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Asian 10,000 Challenge invite[edit]

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 00:59, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

17:39, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

16:18, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

23:01, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

19:17, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

15:32, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Aboluay. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

21:16, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

A bit of help reviewing two small changes to two Arabic pages ?[edit]

Hello Aboluay,

In addition to your offer to translate from Arabic to English, I see that you contribute a lot to the Arabic Wikipedia.

Just to get a feel for other languages and their Wikipedias, I occasionally make (trivial) edits in other languages, including Arabic.

A couple of months ago I fixed a typo here and here.

The changes are still pending, and are apparently awaiting review by someone else. Is there any chance you could do that?

Thanks either way, Lklundin (talk) 08:44, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Lklundin (talk) 16:05, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Can you help verify translations of articles from Arabic[edit]

Hello,

Would you be able to help evaluate the accuracy of translations of Wikipedia articles from Arabic to English Wikipedia?

File:Language icon.svg

This would involve evaluating a translated article on English Wikipedia by comparing it to the original Arabic article, and marking it "Pass" or "Fail" based on whether the translation faithfully represents the original. Here's the reason for this request:

There are a number of articles on English Wikipedia that were created as machine translations from different languages including Arabic , using the Content Translation tool, sometimes by users with no knowledge of the source language. The config problem that allowed this to happen has since been fixed, but this has left us with a backlog of articles whose accuracy of translation is suspect or unknown, including some articles translated from Arabic. In many cases, other editors have come forward later to copyedit and fix any English grammar or style issues, but that doesn't necessarily mean that the translation is accurate, as factual errors from the original translation may remain. To put it another way: Good English is not the same as good translation.

If you can help out, that would be great. Here's a sample of the articles that need checking:

All you have to do, is compare the English article to the Arabic article, and mark it "Pass" or "Fail" (templates {{Pass}} and {{Fail}} may be useful). (Naturally, if you feel like fixing an inaccurate translation and then marking it "Pass", that's even better, but it isn't required.)

If you can help, please let me know. Thanks! Mathglot (talk) 09:41, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Aboluay. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Aboluay. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Aboluay. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]