Jump to content

User talk:Absolutiste

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

June 2021[edit]

Stop icon This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Ryan Phillippe, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. NJZombie (talk) 17:23, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Austria-Hungary, you may be blocked from editing. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 16:56, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Failure to communicate[edit]

Is there any reason you're ignoring the talk page discussion? M.Bitton (talk) 15:59, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not ignoring anything. I'm being very clear about the situation. The French state now uses the darker flag. You do not have more authority than the French government, do you? Britannicus the Scot (talk) 16:02, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have ignored the talk page discussion and as I explained (using reliable sources), the situation is not as simple as you think. Besides, the flag was changed last year without anyone noticing until now, so what's the rush? M.Bitton (talk) 16:04, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The French state now uses the darker flag As stated by M.Bitton, the flag was changed last year without notice. Even then, the variant you are using doesn't even seem to even be the correct variant as the 1794 variant is the probable new variant as seen On the French Wikipedia. I shouldn't even have this conversation in your talk page but apparently WP:BRD doesn't exist anymore. SuperSkaterDude45 (talk) 16:24, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on France. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. M.Bitton (talk) 16:02, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022[edit]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Cyrus the Great, you may be blocked from editing. You really should read the article before adding material that contradicts the article, which says "so far no clear evidence has been found to indicate that Cyrus practiced a specific religion. " - and more. Doug Weller talk 13:32, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Tower of Babel, you may be blocked from editing. bonadea contributions talk 11:51, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]