User talk:Abyssal/Archive 12

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


DYK for Paleontology in Virginia[edit]

KTC (talk) 16:21, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Paleontology in Washington, D.C.[edit]

KTC (talk) 16:21, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Paleontology in Wyoming[edit]

KTC (talk) 16:21, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Paleontology in Florida[edit]

KTC (talk) 16:22, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Paleontology in Hawaii[edit]

KTC (talk) 16:22, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Paleontology in Illinois[edit]

KTC (talk) 16:22, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Paleontology in Indiana[edit]

KTC (talk) 16:23, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Paleontology in Kentucky[edit]

KTC (talk) 16:23, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Paleontology in Maine[edit]

KTC (talk) 16:23, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Paleontology in Michigan[edit]

KTC (talk) 16:23, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Paleontology in New Hampshire[edit]

KTC (talk) 16:24, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Paleontology in Ohio[edit]

KTC (talk) 16:24, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Paleontology in Oregon[edit]

KTC (talk) 16:24, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Paleontology in Rhode Island[edit]

KTC (talk) 16:25, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Paleontology in Vermont[edit]

KTC (talk) 16:25, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Paleontology in Washington[edit]

KTC (talk) 16:25, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Paleontology in West Virginia[edit]

KTC (talk) 16:26, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Paleontology in Wisconsin[edit]

KTC (talk) 16:26, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Special Barnstar
Wow, amazing, for your hard and valuable work creating paleontology articles for every American state! You're a gem, keep up the great work! ♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 18:41, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto[edit]

As the previous holder of the record for the number of new articles included in a single DYK, I take my hat off to you. Not only an amazing DYK, but fantastically high quality individual articles, and on one of my favourite subjects too! :-) hamiltonstone (talk) 22:38, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

RE: 6th Congress[edit]

Where is it borderline copypasted??? --TIAYN (talk) 19:31, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Australia women's national wheelchair basketball team at the 2012 Summer Paralympics[edit]

If you could let me know what specific changes you require to pass the article for DYK, that would be greatly appreciated. Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:11, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have overhauled the Mexico section. Can you please take another look? Hawkeye7 (talk) 04:23, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK Review for Bill Heindl Jr.[edit]

Please see my reply on Template:Did you know nominations/Bill Heindl, Jr.. You've raised a concern that doesn't exist about the article, and consequently, the DYK nom. I'd like to get this resolved so it can pass. Thanks. Echoedmyron (talk) 05:38, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of discussion[edit]

A few months ago, you participated in a discussion on Wikipedia talk:Did you know about Gibraltar-related DYKs on the Main Page. I am proposing that the temporary restrictions on such DYKs, which were imposed in September 2012, should be lifted and have set out a case for doing so at Wikipedia talk:Did you know/Gibraltar-related DYKs. If you have a view on this, please comment at that page. Prioryman (talk) 22:08, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

RE: 6th Congress[edit]

Is it good enough now?? --TIAYN (talk) 09:48, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Anchiceratops[edit]

Hallo, Abyssal! As you perhaps have noticed, I'm in the habit of making some additions to English dinosaur articles after I have expanded or created their counterparts on the Dutch Wikipedia. Recently it was the turn of Anchiceratops. While googling information about this creature, I happened upon a concept page you created for specimen NMC 8547, the one that Mallon removed from the material of Anchiceratops. It occurred to me that this might a good occasion to actually create the article — or, alternatively, to add the information for the time being, until future finds prove or disprove the identity, to the Anchiceratops article, obviously with the necessary explanations, caveats and such. Do you think this might be expedient at the moment? Or is it too early yet?

Greetings, --MWAK (talk) 09:09, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]