User talk:Ace Class Shadow/Sixth archive

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Macintosh HD-Users-Q-Desktop-images-raww.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Macintosh HD-Users-Q-Desktop-images-raww.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:45, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Macintosh HD-Users-Q-Desktop-kanami.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Macintosh HD-Users-Q-Desktop-kanami.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:47, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

re: Creote

Looking over it, yes, the character history and powers mirror the gl.com page. The problem is we've got no way of knowing which way the traffic went. If the gl article was up prior to June 25, 2006, and in it's current form, then the 1st 2 sections of ours is a copyvio. Otherwise, the gl is a lift from here (the text for ours is essentially the same as when it was first posted).

That said, our article, as it stands, lacks real world context, reads as a two-for-one cover both Creote and Savant, and is about 1/2 1 massive quote. - J Greb (talk) 01:07, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

That really is a big problem with a lot of sites, they don't post a copyright notice or a "created/last updated" note. That leaves us with the question, and maybe needing to approach Tigerhawk about it. Especially if the article is going to be tweaked. - J Greb (talk) 02:52, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Macintosh_HD-Users-Q-Desktop-39_dearka.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Macintosh_HD-Users-Q-Desktop-39_dearka.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Rockfang (talk) 15:11, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:MSW

Template:MSW has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 07:21, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

?

Where you been Ace, I miss you. let me know if you get htis. I hope you rember me from years ago. I helped with Spiderman 3. bye. Boggydark (talk) 19:12, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:ORW

Template:ORW has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 21:35, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Pointer to discussion about TV episode redirects

It's been a while since the dispute about TV episode article naming. I see that you're not very active here any more, but I wanted to let you know that there's a new (much smaller, I hope!) discussion about whether to keep the redirects that have "unnecessary" disambiguation or not — one of the byproducts of an early compromise move in that debate. The new discussion is at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (television)#Redirects, with related discussions at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2008 October 8. Hope to see you there. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 18:34, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Redirect of Nothing to Hide

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Nothing to Hide, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Nothing to Hide is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Nothing to Hide, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 23:10, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

RfD nomination of Template:Heroescharacterbox

I have nominated Template:Heroescharacterbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Magioladitis (talk) 02:05, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Macintosh HD-Users-Q-Desktop-Razor.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Macintosh HD-Users-Q-Desktop-Razor.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 02:42, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Macintosh HD-Users-Q-Desktop-Perfen.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Macintosh HD-Users-Q-Desktop-Perfen.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:47, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Quick question

Sorry to bother you. Your recent edit on Sorority Row == what does GIPU mean, please? Pardon my ignorance. Accounting4Taste:talk 23:48, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Oh man. That takes me back. Given IP User. It's on my front page. Ace Class Shadow; My talk. 00:07, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Much obliged, and sorry to not have seen that on your front page. I've been having problems with a GIPU (one with a floating number) on Sorority Row today and note by your comments on its talk page that you'd like some help. What exactly can I do to assist you? Accounting4Taste:talk 00:24, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, that was my second dumb note in five minutes. (D'oh!) It seems obvious that you would like some help policing the article against weird additions by a GIPU. I will gladly do that as best I can... if you look at the edit history and my talk page, you may find an explanation for vandalism by a number of IP numbers, which I assume to be the same floating-point GIPU. I'll continue to monitor the article until he gets bored. Accounting4Taste:talk 00:30, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

You know, the sad/tough part is that I'm NOT a regular editor anymore. Long story. I will keep an eye on this article, though. I've made another post on the talk and reverted another couple of edits. I can only find one reference to Megan Good being in the movie, so far (on a blog, no less <,<). Nothing on her page. Either it's a cameo that almost no one knows about or someone's mistaken. I'm betting on the latter. Ace Class Shadow; My talk. 17:39, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Good to see you again, Ace. Hope you've been well. Erik (talk | contribs | wt:film) 18:34, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

I've seen better days... (and the bottom drops out..) Ace Class Shadow; My talk. 17:58, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

You got it all wrong

I look at all the edits before reverting and those ripcord edits its friend/relationship/characters interests when that section is for the movie plot and that transformers edit you made simmons called in the rail gun he targeted it so HE is responsible for devastators death Im not an edit warrior I just do what I believe is right

Rip cord 1.we have it mentioned he likes her 2.We already know hes Dukes best friend and we know he likes to fly that was in the above section 3.None of the other G.I. Joe articles have that relationship stuff which doesnt go in that section they all have relationships section

You 1.You undo all edits which arent yours as well 2.You alwayts think your right to 3.You dont really know enough about this stuff to edit

The Movie Master 1 (talk) 18:04, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:Heroes character box

Template:Heroes character box has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Magioladitis (talk) 23:52, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

Avoiding a move war

Hi. Please take a look at Talk:Heavy Load#Requested move. The move you're trying to carry out was just proposed and closed by an admin as no consensus for the move. Station1 (talk) 18:17, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

Rip cord

Im worried about you to you dont know how to set up characters from the movie if you look at Storm Shadow not relationship stuff friend stuff movie stuff same with Destro Snake Eyes and Baroness etc... it MOVIE PLOT not relationship or friendship or what they like which is that entire section but fine keep it like that and please dont say you know me when you really dont The Movie Master 1 (talk) 00:56, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

<.< I'm speechless. Ace Class Shadow; My talk. 23:44, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

Re:Nekron

Please read WP:CRYSTAL. Until the comic comes out, info about its content should not be added to articles. Thank you. Friginator (talk) 17:41, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Do not intentionally start edit wars. Please take Wikpedia policy seriously. Friginator (talk) 17:54, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Please adhere to the Three revert rule, and remember to be civil. Calling someone's edits "stupid" is not constructive. Once the comic actually comes out, the info can be added. Please do not continue. Thank you. Friginator (talk) 18:04, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

<^>-_- Ace Class Shadow; My talk. 18:06, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

I'll respond to your question here Ace.

In simplest terms: We should not be including in an in-story tone information from an issue of a comic that has yet to go in sale. This is why Nekron has routinely been removed from the BLC roster since late August.

And yes, it is a CB issue. It is possible that DC can change the direction of the story. Or that Johns was having "fun".

In all honesty, all of the articles related to the "Blackest Night" story arc should have "Nekron" removed from the in-story sections until Blackest Night #5 is on sale in November. The only two places I can think of that the nugget can be justified is in the publication histories sections of the "Blackest Night" and "Nekron" articles. And that would amount to "In an interview released in August to promote Blackest Night, Johns revealed that he has written Nekron as the power behind the Black Lanterns."

- J Greb (talk) 22:30, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Fair enough. I'll drop it. Ace Class Shadow; My talk. 23:15, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Hana Gitelman

I have nominated Hana Gitelman, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hana Gitelman. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Sceptre ^(talk) 14:53, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Macintosh HD-Users-Q-Desktop-39 dearka.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Macintosh HD-Users-Q-Desktop-39 dearka.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 04:31, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 02:21, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

The Power. The PO-WER!!!
Heh. Whatever. Ace Class Shadow; My talk. 18:22, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

Some tea perhaps?

Dude, this edit summary in the Kryptonite article was entirely inappropriate. Imagine how you might react if someone dropped the f-bomb on one of your edits; would you be inclined to respond with a 'gee, i guess I was wrong - could you help me?' or are you more likely to come out with guns blazing? The way Wikipedia works is when we all work to create something more than ourselves, and harsh talk like that is pretty divisive. You've over 12k edits here; not sure what prompted your response, but you need to calm down.
On another note, the edit in question doesn't provide citations for the inclusion of what you term as Supe's mom's name. You need to provide that, and I am guessing that will pretty much put an end to the reverting. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 18:17, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

Witty, and yet, unconvincing. I appreciate your compulsion to be "different", but it isn't about censoring; its about being polite. No one cares if you toss out a cuss word. Lots of people will care if you denigrate their edits using such. Your right to be an individual is limited only by the community's right to edit with - or in spite of - that exercise of individuality. I am not saying you have to be a drone; I am saying you could extend to others the same level of civility that you yourself would expect. It certainly makes allowing for your idiosyncrasies a lot more palatable. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 19:13, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

Of course we're cool, brother. :) - Jack Sebastian (talk) 03:08, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

Pifeedback

Pifeedback

Could you give your opinion on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#Pifeedback.com?ChaosMaster16 (talk) 12:58, 13 July 2010 (UTC)ChaosMaster16

Take note, folks. While this approach to gathering voices and developing "consensus" can produce a bit of Talkspam, (especially on the pages of less active users, like myself,) it's at least proactive. Looking at the talk page linked here, I can see this guy got a good number of responses. Now, if more people used this method for, say, deletion and move debates, I'd be much more pleased. Ace Class Shadow; My talk. 18:42, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

The Black List

I have no problem with the deletion, but to answer the question as to why are they listed, it's because a lot of the movies in said survey are picked up and are produced and make it to the big screen (some even win/ are nominated for Oscars, Golden Globes. etc.) The lists are important because all of the scripts are unproduced when the book is released. From the 2005 survey, 2 of the movies that were notable were Juno and The Kite Runner. I was thinking to make each year their own page to view the list, but I won't start it if it will be deleted. Would you rather it be a seperate page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Phaeton23 (talk • contribs) 20:45, December 30, 2010 (UTC)

Regarding prestige format

Sorry, but I still don't agree with the original tag you placed on the page. There is some information that is more effectively presented in a list – the discography of a band, for example. The list of 'prestige format' comics was clearly one such thing. If you can explain to me how a list of over 50 items could be presented in prose at all, much less effectively, I would appreciate the enlightenment.

Clearly, you have hit on the 'real' item of debate – whether the list is necessary at all. I can see some value in it – mostly, that it provides the empirical 'proof' that the prestige format has most commonly been used by DC, and rarely by other comic book companies, and finding a reference for this fact might be quite difficult. But, on the other hand, it's a very long list, with little point to it besides that, as far as I can see. I dont' have a strong enough opinion that I think it's worth debating, or trying to change it back.

As you rightly point out, I should have addressed this on the talk page while making my edit, as you did, so my apologies. Cheers, Genesiswinter (talk) 19:12, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

Four Horsemen

Sorry. --User:Woohookitty ^{Disamming fool!} 04:24, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:RauLeCreuset.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:RauLeCreuset.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 04:26, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bond 23

A tag has been placed on Bond 23, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to an article talk page, file description page, file talk page, MediaWiki page, MediaWiki talk page, category talk page, portal talk page, template talk page, help talk, user page, user talk or special page from the main/article space.

If you can fix the redirect to point to a mainspace page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you are fixing the redirect. If you think the redirect should be retained as is for some reason, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the article's talk page directly to give your reasons. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. DASHBot (talk) 06:01, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bond 23

A tag has been placed on Bond 23, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to an article talk page, file description page, file talk page, MediaWiki page, MediaWiki talk page, category talk page, portal talk page, template talk page, help talk, user page, user talk or special page from the main/article space.

If you can fix the redirect to point to a mainspace page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you are fixing the redirect. If you think the redirect should be retained as is for some reason, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the article's talk page directly to give your reasons. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. DASHBot (talk) 23:00, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

New Suri Cruise AfD

Hello. You previously voted in the 2006 AfD for Suri Cruise. At the time, Suri was less than 10 days old, and the ultimate verdict was to turn the article into a redirect to her mother's page.

Since then, Suri has become much more notable in her own right as a toddler fashion icon, with over 13 million hits on google image search. After getting an administrator to lift the protection on the redirect, I recently restored the article as a stub, but an editor who believes that "6 year olds are not inherently notable" has again requested deletion.

If it's not too much trouble, I'd appreciate your making your opinion known at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suri Cruise (2nd nomination) Warren Dew (talk) 07:34, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Image-toosmall

Template:Image-toosmall has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — This, that, and the other (talk) 06:06, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

anchored list template

I've fixed {{anchored list}} - it was generating invalid anchor names. Unfortunately this means any old links to list items in your essay will now be broken. ··gracefool☺ 21:58, 21 June 2012 (UTC)