User talk:Achhainsaan

Trying to make Wikipedia a More knowledgeable Encyclopedia

Achhainsaan, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Achhainsaan! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

June 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

This is an obvious sockpuppet of Dusrapehelu. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 16:59, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Achhainsaan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sir, why i am blocked and what is this Dusrapehelu, please unblock me there might be a misunderstanding. Achhainsaan (talk) 17:02, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 17:58, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

User:Cullen328I have read the tea house talks just now, you are comparing me with some Dusrapehelu user, i asked that question not for 2019_Indian_general_election, i asked that for this article WION(TV Channel). you can check this article, there was a column of "accuracy" in this article, which is now removed, but some people are reverting it and others are again putting it in the article, it was this user User:Ganbaruby i was asking for. he is at a big post in wikipedia even then he was not following that Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view policy. i am not that dusrapehelu, i a different person, and about my comments on 2019_Indian_general_election they are just some of my points , this User:Number_57 was putting "Alliance seat". i just said, this "parameter" is never used in any other election, why are you using it here. please consider my request, it is just a misunderstanding, please consider it

August 2021

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Doug Weller talk 16:21, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]