User talk:AcidRock67

Welcome![edit]

Hello, AcidRock67, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! TFD (talk) 21:39, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 03:32, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent edit warring at Aldous Huxley and Timothy Leary after several shorter blocks, with no indication that you'll ever stop (edit warring immediately resumed after latest previous block). If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bishonen | talk 09:35, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AcidRock67 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

How the fuck am I blocked indefinitely for only adding one word to two seperate articles? AcidRock67 (talk) 15:11, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You were blocked for doing it before; when the block expired, you immediately starting doing it again. That showed flagrant disregard for the rules. Then, you were offered an olive branch and a chance to participate in the community; when you removed the message but did not self-revert, you effectively made a direct refusal. An indefinite block is appropriate when an editor has disrupted Wikipedia in the past and demonstrates intent to continue doing so in the future. —C.Fred (talk) 15:18, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'm going to take this as a request to have your talk page privileges revoked and grant it.

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. —C.Fred (talk) 15:56, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]