Jump to content

User talk:AdamBr06

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: William Hanson (April 9)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by TipsyElephant were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
TipsyElephant (talk) 01:53, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, AdamBr06! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! TipsyElephant (talk) 01:53, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:William Hanson (author) has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:William Hanson (author). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 13:47, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:William Hanson (author) has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:William Hanson (author). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 13:47, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: William Hanson (author) (April 18)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by NP83 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
NP83 (talk) 04:41, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: William Hanson (author) (April 29)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by TipsyElephant were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
TipsyElephant (talk) 15:42, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:William Hanson, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GPL93 (talk) 15:03, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:JayA990 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/JayA990. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 22:25, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AdamBr06 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

The claim my account is an alternate account of ‘JayA990’ is false and unjustified - this is my only Wikipedia user account. I understand inconsistencies in the editing of an article re: William Hanson (Author); particularly one instance where they copied and pasted a response I made following a question by user ‘TipsyElephant’ (15:59, 29 April 2023 (UTC)) - though I have no relationship, neither personal nor professional, to the article’s subject, nor do I have any connection, personally or professionally, with the user JayA990, and this is not an alternate account of this user. I am willing to co-operate to attempt to rectify this error.

Decline reason:

I suspect based on the SPI that this is more meat puppetry than sock puppetry, but it is treated the same. Please explain in a new request how you came to edit about the same obscure topic as a blocked user. 331dot (talk) 12:43, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AdamBr06 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

The article subject has gained popularity as a result of increasing media presence, and the increasing media presence of his podcast co-presenter in British television. My aim was not to act not to create promotional material for the subject, rather to create a Wikipedia page for a relatively high-profile celebrity in the UK. I again re-affirm I have no connection to the subject or any other contributor.

Decline reason:

Given this and this, I don't believe you. Yamla (talk) 19:50, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This does not actually deal with the reason for the block.-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:25, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Was in response to the previous comment AdamBr06 (talk) 15:44, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]