User talk:Adamgc10

Welcome!

Hello, Adamgc10, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 01:00, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ecole Tuxedo Park School has been accepted[edit]

Ecole Tuxedo Park School, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 14:14, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eric Coy, Winnipeg (June 6)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bearcat was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

An article about a city neighbourhood has to be referenced to reliable source content about the neighbourhood in media and/or books, and notability cannot be supported by directly affiliated entities like the self-published websites of the city or organizations in the neighbourhood. We require evidence that the neighbourhood has been the subject of third-party coverage and analysis, not just verification that it exists.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Eric Coy, Winnipeg and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bearcat (talk) 20:32, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Adamgc10! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bearcat (talk) 20:32, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Elmhurst, Winnipeg (June 15)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bearcat was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This is referenced too heavily to primary sources that are not support for notability at all, and the only references that actually come from proper WP:GNG-worthy media are both about a golf course rather than the neighbourhood per se.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Elmhurst, Winnipeg and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bearcat (talk) 02:14, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Eric Coy, Winnipeg[edit]

Hello, Adamgc10. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Eric Coy, Winnipeg, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:06, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Elmhurst, Winnipeg[edit]

Hello, Adamgc10. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Elmhurst, Winnipeg, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:05, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, Adamgc10. Thank you for your work on Ridgedale, Winnipeg. User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Notes from preliminary new page review. imo this (and other similar articles on neighborhoods in the Winnipeg area should be merged into the city/town (articles) that they are located in. IMO they pretty clearly fail the wp:notability test.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 22:17, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, Adamgc10. Thank you for your work on Tuxedo, Winnipeg (neighbourhood). User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Notes from preliminary new page review. imo this (and other similar articles on neighborhoods in the Winnipeg area should be merged into the city/town (articles) that they are located in. (in this case the Tuxedo article) IMO they pretty clearly fail the wp:notability test.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 22:24, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, Adamgc10. Thank you for your work on South Tuxedo, Winnipeg. User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Notes from preliminary new page review. imo this (and other similar articles on neighborhoods in the Winnipeg area should be merged into the city/town (articles) that they are located in. IMO they pretty clearly fail the wp:notability test.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 22:24, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]